wundfolkspuristspragmatic
/data/papers/wundfolkspuristspragmatic/wundfolkspuristspragmatic.yamlschema_version: '1.2'
paper:
paper_id: wundfolkspuristspragmatic
citation: Wu, S. (2025). Are Folks Purists or Pragmatic Encroachers? New Discoveries of Relation between Knowledge and Action
from Experimental Philosophy. Episteme, 22, 304–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2023.56
short_label: Wu 2025
doi: 10.1017/epi.2023.56
published: 'Yes'
year: 2025
language: English
language_other: null
research_objective: Report three experiments with Chinese participants using modified DeRose bank, Cohen airport, and Pinillos
spelling/typo cases to test whether practical stakes affect knowledge attributions and whether knowledge and action judgments
co-vary as predicted by pragmatic encroachment.
data_availability:
data_available_online: 'Yes'
url: https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2023.56
notes: Paper states that supplementary materials are available on CJO. A local copy of official Supplementary Materials
2 (translated stimuli materials in English) is stored under out/external/S1742360023000564sup002.pdf, with extracted
text at out/external/S1742360023000564sup002.txt.
notes: null
studies:
- study_id: 1
label: Experiment 1
language: other
language_other: 'Chinese'
objective: Test whether stakes affect knowledge attributions and action judgments by having participants choose one of four
response options that jointly characterize the protagonist’s epistemic state (knows vs does not know) and action requirement
(needs to recheck vs not) across three classic vignette families.
sample:
n_final: 272
recruitment: other
recruitment_other: Wenjuanxing (online Chinese survey platform).
compensation: null
compensation_other: null
characteristics: Effective sample aged 18–58 (M=29.69, SD=7.16); 59.6% female; materials delivered in Chinese; average
completion ~2.5 minutes.
mean_age: 29.69
mean_age_prov:
page: null
quote: The effective sample ranged from 18 to 58 years old (M = 29.69, SD = 7.16), with females comprising 59.6%.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
provenance:
page: null
quote: Four hundred twenty-five questionnaires were collected in total, and 272 were deemed effective… The experiments
were conducted via the online survey platform Wenjuanxing (http://www.wjx.cn), with all materials delivered in Chinese.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
design: Between-Subjects
design_other: '3 (scenario: Bank/Airport/Spelling) × 2 (stakes: low vs high) between-subjects; each participant read one
scenario and selected one of four options (A–D) combining knowledge attribution and action requirement.'
manipulated_factors:
- Stakes (low vs high)
- Scenario (Bank vs Airport vs Spelling)
paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
paradigm_other: null
scale:
label: binary
points: 2
anchors: 'Attributes knowledge (A or B) vs does not attribute knowledge (C or D).'
direction: null
provenance:
page: null
quote: After reading the material, participants were asked to choose the best description of the protagonist's situation
from the following four options…
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
measures:
knowledge_question_text: Choose which of four options (A–D) best describes the protagonist’s situation (joint knowledge×action
characterization). Knowledge attribution is operationalized as selecting A or B (vs C or D).
knowledge_question_first: null
additional_question_text: null
scenarios:
- scenario_code: bank
scenario_type: DeRose-style bank deposit / bank-hours vignette (modified).
high_stakes_text: 'High stakes: John must deposit cash by Monday to avoid eviction (rent transfer); many banks are closed
on Saturdays; John remembers coming on a Saturday half a year ago.'
low_stakes_text: 'Low stakes: depositing the cash is not important; can deposit early or later.'
provenance:
page: null
quote: 'High-stake: “If he fails to deposit this money in the bank by Monday… he will be evicted immediately.” Low-stake:
“this money does not require to be deposited these days… it makes no difference to deposit it early or later.”'
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
- scenario_code: airport
scenario_type: Cohen-style airport/flight vignette (modified; organ courier vs vacation).
high_stakes_text: 'High stakes: organ courier transporting a liver to Chicago; a direct flight is necessary to prevent
organ spoilage.'
low_stakes_text: 'Low stakes: on vacation flying to Chicago for a basketball game; missing the game would not matter.'
provenance:
page: null
quote: “In the Airport cases, the protagonist is an organ courier… transport a liver to Chicago… Conversely, in the
low-stake case, the protagonist is on vacation… basketball game.”
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
- scenario_code: typos
scenario_type: Pinillos-style spelling/typo vignette (modified; coursework).
high_stakes_text: 'High stakes: any typo in coursework could lead to expulsion from school.'
low_stakes_text: 'Low stakes: typos in coursework bear no consequence or significance.'
provenance:
page: null
quote: “In the Spelling cases… In the high-stake case, any typo in his coursework could lead him to get expelled from
school… in the low-stake case, typos… bear no consequence or significance.”
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
effects:
- effect_id: s1_e1
subgroup: Experiment 1 — Bank (knowledge attribution)
subgroup_desc: 'Binary: A&B = attributes knowledge vs C&D = does not attribute knowledge (Bank case)'
design: Between-Subjects
design_other: null
moderators: &id001
scenario: bank
skeptical_pressure: 'Yes'
awareness: 'Yes'
evidence: First Person
attribution_person: Other
evidence_reliability: Medium
moderators_coding: &id002
scenario:
provenance:
page: 7
quote: Today is Friday, and it's the payday of the restaurant where John works. Because the salary at this restaurant
is paid in cash, John intends to deposit this money in the bank after work.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: Vignette is explicitly a bank deposit/bank-hours scenario in the official supplementary stimuli.
skeptical_pressure:
provenance:
page: 7
quote: Many banks are closed on Saturdays, but John remembers that he came to the bank on a Saturday morning half
a year ago and found it open.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: The vignette explicitly introduces an alternative possibility (bank may be closed on Saturday).
awareness:
provenance:
page: 7
quote: If he fails to deposit this money in the bank by Monday, his rent will not be paid on time due to insufficient
funds in his account. His landlord is very strict. If he does not pay the rent on time, he will be evicted immediately.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: Stakes are described as part of the protagonist’s situation (so the agent is aware of what is at stake).
evidence:
provenance:
page: 7
quote: John remembers that he came to the bank on a Saturday morning half a year ago and found it open.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: The evidence is the agent’s own memory/experience (first-person evidence).
attribution_person:
provenance:
page: 7
quote: John knows the bank is open on Saturday.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: Participants choose among third-person descriptions of whether John knows.
evidence_reliability:
provenance:
page: 7
quote: John remembers that he came to the bank on a Saturday morning half a year ago and found it open.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: The belief rests on a single remembered visit half a year earlier; this is more than mere guesswork but weaker
than a highly reliable official source, so coded Medium.
contrast:
group_high: high_stakes
group_low: low_stakes
sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
other_notes: Outcome mean = proportion attributing knowledge (A&B).
groups:
- group_id: low_stakes
label: null
n: 50
mean: 0.8
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 12
quote: The Bank cases,Count,40,32,10,,12
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p12_t2.csv
- group_id: high_stakes
label: null
n: 44
mean: 0.7272727272727273
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 12
quote: The Bank cases,Count,40,32,10,,12
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p12_t2.csv
effect_size:
metric: SMD
d: 0.223544630185
v: 0.072824600743
computed_from: groups
needs_review: false
notes: Computed from exact 2×2 table counts (A&B vs C&D) via esc::esc_2x2 (OR -> d) in analysis/effect_sizes.qmd.
quality_flags: []
notes: null
- effect_id: s1_e2
subgroup: Experiment 1 — Airport (knowledge attribution)
subgroup_desc: 'Binary: A&B = attributes knowledge vs C&D = does not attribute knowledge (Airport case)'
design: Between-Subjects
design_other: null
moderators: &id003
scenario: airport
skeptical_pressure: 'Yes'
awareness: 'Yes'
evidence: External
attribution_person: Other
evidence_reliability: High
moderators_coding: &id004
scenario:
provenance:
page: 8
quote: John is an organ courier.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: Scenario is an airport/flight vignette about whether a Chicago flight is direct.
skeptical_pressure:
provenance:
page: 8
quote: Online booking information is sometimes inaccurate.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: The vignette explicitly introduces a counterconsideration that the website information might be wrong.
awareness:
provenance:
page: 8
quote: Today is Saturday, and his job today is transporting a liver. If he can catch a direct flight to Chicago
today, he will be in time to deliver the organ to a patient in Chicago.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: Stakes are described as part of the protagonist’s situation (so the agent is aware of what is at stake).
evidence:
provenance:
page: 8
quote: When he checks the airline's website, he sees that there is a direct flight to Chicago today.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: The most central evidence for whether today's flight is direct comes from the airline website; John's memory
of a direct flight two weeks earlier is corroborating but secondary.
attribution_person:
provenance:
page: 9
quote: John knows that this flight is direct.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: Participants choose among third-person descriptions of whether John knows.
evidence_reliability:
provenance:
page: 8
quote: Online booking information is sometimes inaccurate.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: The central external source is explicitly characterized as not always accurate; coded Low per the project
guide.
contrast:
group_high: high_stakes
group_low: low_stakes
sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
other_notes: Outcome mean = proportion attributing knowledge (A&B).
groups:
- group_id: low_stakes
label: null
n: 46
mean: 0.8695652173913043
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 12
quote: The Airport cases,Count,40,41,6,,4
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p12_t2.csv
- group_id: high_stakes
label: null
n: 45
mean: 0.9111111111111111
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 12
quote: The Airport cases,Count,40,41,6,,4
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p12_t2.csv
effect_size:
metric: SMD
d: -0.23715838101
v: 0.141664313471
computed_from: groups
needs_review: false
notes: Computed from exact 2×2 table counts (A&B vs C&D) via esc::esc_2x2 (OR -> d) in analysis/effect_sizes.qmd.
quality_flags: []
notes: null
- effect_id: s1_e3
subgroup: Experiment 1 — Spelling/Typos (knowledge attribution)
subgroup_desc: 'Binary: A&B = attributes knowledge vs C&D = does not attribute knowledge (Spelling/typos case)'
design: Between-Subjects
design_other: null
moderators: &id005
scenario: typos
skeptical_pressure: 'No'
awareness: 'Yes'
evidence: First Person
attribution_person: Other
evidence_reliability: High
moderators_coding: &id006
scenario:
provenance:
page: 9
quote: John is a smart and diligent student. He has just finished the coursework for the linguistics course. This
coursework is due tomorrow.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: Scenario concerns proofreading coursework for typos/spelling, matching the typos vignette family.
skeptical_pressure:
provenance:
page: 9
quote: Although John doesn't often make mistakes in spelling, he checked his coursework twice with a dictionary
after finishing his coursework.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: No explicit doubt or counterconsideration is raised; the vignette changes stakes but does not add a skeptical
cue.
awareness:
provenance:
page: 10
quote: Whether John gets an A in this course concerns whether he can continue to have the scholarship. Without this
scholarship, he will be expelled because he cannot pay the tuition.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: Stakes are described as part of the protagonist’s situation (so the agent is aware of what is at stake).
evidence:
provenance:
page: 9
quote: Although John doesn't often make mistakes in spelling, he checked his coursework twice with a dictionary
after finishing his coursework.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: The evidence is generated by the protagonist's own proofreading/checking, aided by a dictionary.
attribution_person:
provenance:
page: 10
quote: John knows there is no typo in the coursework.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: Participants choose among third-person descriptions of whether John knows.
evidence_reliability:
provenance:
page: 9
quote: John doesn't often make mistakes in spelling, and he checked his coursework twice with a dictionary after
finishing his coursework.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
reason: The vignette describes a good speller who proofread twice with a dictionary, which supports coding the evidence
as relatively high reliability.
contrast:
group_high: high_stakes
group_low: low_stakes
sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
other_notes: Outcome mean = proportion attributing knowledge (A&B).
groups:
- group_id: low_stakes
label: Low stakes
n: 48
mean: 0.6041666666666666
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 12
quote: The Spelling cases,Count,29,27,19,,12
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p12_t2.csv
- group_id: high_stakes
label: High stakes
n: 39
mean: 0.6923076923076923
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 12
quote: The Spelling cases,Count,29,27,19,,12
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p12_t2.csv
effect_size:
metric: SMD
d: -0.213956059887
v: 0.063067788588
computed_from: groups
needs_review: false
notes: Computed from exact 2×2 table counts (A&B vs C&D) via esc::esc_2x2 (OR -> d) in analysis/effect_sizes.qmd.
quality_flags: []
notes: null
notes: null
- study_id: 2
label: Experiment 2
language: other
language_other: 'Chinese'
objective: Replicate Experiment 1 with modified options intended to remove a potential ambiguity (need for extra information
beyond whether p) and test whether stakes affect knowledge attributions and action judgments.
sample:
n_final: 272
recruitment: other
recruitment_other: Wenjuanxing (online Chinese survey platform).
compensation: null
compensation_other: null
characteristics: Effective sample aged 18–62 (M=30.62, SD=7.50); 65.1% female; materials delivered in Chinese; average
completion ~3 minutes.
mean_age: 30.62
mean_age_prov:
page: null
quote: The effective sample ranged from 18 to 62 years old (M = 30.62, SD = 7.50), with females comprising 65.1%.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
provenance:
page: null
quote: Four hundred two questionnaires were collected in total, and 272 were deemed effective… The experiments were
conducted via the online survey platform Wenjuanxing (http://www.wjx.cn), with all materials delivered in Chinese.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
design: Between-Subjects
design_other: Same 3×2 between-subjects design as Experiment 1; participants select one of four modified options (A–D) combining
knowledge attribution and action requirement.
manipulated_factors:
- Stakes (low vs high)
- Scenario (Bank vs Airport vs Spelling)
paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
paradigm_other: null
scale:
label: binary
points: 2
anchors: 'Attributes knowledge (A or B) vs does not attribute knowledge (C or D).'
direction: null
provenance:
page: null
quote: '“Take the Bank cases… the four modified options were as follows: A. John knows the bank is open on Saturday.
It is necessary… B.… C.… D.… ”'
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
measures:
knowledge_question_text: Choose which of four modified options (A–D) best describes the protagonist’s situation (joint
knowledge×action characterization). Knowledge attribution is operationalized as selecting A or B (vs C or D).
knowledge_question_first: null
additional_question_text: null
scenarios:
- scenario_code: bank
scenario_type: DeRose-style bank deposit / bank-hours vignette (modified).
high_stakes_text: 'High stakes: John must deposit cash by Monday to avoid eviction.'
low_stakes_text: 'Low stakes: depositing the cash is not important.'
provenance:
page: null
quote: Experiment 2 took the same materials and between-subject design as Experiment 1.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
- scenario_code: airport
scenario_type: Cohen-style airport/flight vignette (modified; organ courier vs vacation).
high_stakes_text: 'High stakes: organ courier transporting a liver to Chicago; direct flight needed.'
low_stakes_text: 'Low stakes: on vacation flying to a basketball game.'
provenance:
page: null
quote: Experiment 2 took the same materials and between-subject design as Experiment 1.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
- scenario_code: typos
scenario_type: Pinillos-style spelling/typo vignette (modified; coursework).
high_stakes_text: 'High stakes: any typo could lead to expulsion.'
low_stakes_text: 'Low stakes: typos have no consequence.'
provenance:
page: null
quote: Experiment 2 took the same materials and between-subject design as Experiment 1.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
effects:
- effect_id: s2_e1
subgroup: Experiment 2 — Bank (knowledge attribution)
subgroup_desc: 'Binary: A&B = attributes knowledge vs C&D = does not attribute knowledge (Bank case; modified options)'
design: Between-Subjects
design_other: null
moderators: *id001
moderators_coding: *id002
contrast:
group_high: high_stakes
group_low: low_stakes
sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
other_notes: Outcome mean = proportion attributing knowledge (A&B).
groups:
- group_id: low_stakes
label: Low stakes
n: 42
mean: 0.8571428571428571
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 18
quote: The Bank cases,Count,36,36,6,,12
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p18_t5.csv
- group_id: high_stakes
label: High stakes
n: 48
mean: 0.75
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 18
quote: The Bank cases,Count,36,36,6,,12
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p18_t5.csv
effect_size:
metric: SMD
d: 0.382152069423
v: 0.092877751672
computed_from: groups
needs_review: false
notes: Computed from exact 2×2 table counts (A&B vs C&D) via esc::esc_2x2 (OR -> d) in analysis/effect_sizes.qmd.
quality_flags: []
notes: null
- effect_id: s2_e2
subgroup: Experiment 2 — Airport (knowledge attribution)
subgroup_desc: 'Binary: A&B = attributes knowledge vs C&D = does not attribute knowledge (Airport case; modified options)'
design: Between-Subjects
design_other: null
moderators: *id003
moderators_coding: *id004
contrast:
group_high: high_stakes
group_low: low_stakes
sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
other_notes: Outcome mean = proportion attributing knowledge (A&B).
groups:
- group_id: low_stakes
label: Low stakes
n: 44
mean: 0.7954545454545454
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 18
quote: The Airport cases,Count,35,48,9,,6
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p18_t5.csv
- group_id: high_stakes
label: High stakes
n: 54
mean: 0.8888888888888888
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 18
quote: The Airport cases,Count,35,48,9,,6
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p18_t5.csv
effect_size:
metric: SMD
d: -0.397683487904
v: 0.099451566563
computed_from: groups
needs_review: false
notes: Computed from exact 2×2 table counts (A&B vs C&D) via esc::esc_2x2 (OR -> d) in analysis/effect_sizes.qmd.
quality_flags: []
notes: null
- effect_id: s2_e3
subgroup: Experiment 2 — Spelling/Typos (knowledge attribution)
subgroup_desc: 'Binary: A&B = attributes knowledge vs C&D = does not attribute knowledge (Spelling/typos case; modified
options)'
design: Between-Subjects
design_other: null
moderators: *id005
moderators_coding: *id006
contrast:
group_high: high_stakes
group_low: low_stakes
sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
other_notes: Outcome mean = proportion attributing knowledge (A&B).
groups:
- group_id: low_stakes
label: Low stakes
n: 42
mean: 0.5238095238095238
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 18
quote: The Spelling cases,Count,22,29,20,,13
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p18_t5.csv
- group_id: high_stakes
label: High stakes
n: 42
mean: 0.6904761904761905
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 18
quote: The Spelling cases,Count,22,29,20,,13
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p18_t5.csv
effect_size:
metric: SMD
d: -0.389809538289
v: 0.062878015954
computed_from: groups
needs_review: false
notes: Computed from exact 2×2 table counts (A&B vs C&D) via esc::esc_2x2 (OR -> d) in analysis/effect_sizes.qmd.
quality_flags: []
notes: null
notes: null
- study_id: 3
label: Experiment 3
language: other
language_other: 'Chinese'
objective: Test whether knowledge attributions in high-stakes conditions might be driven by a presumption that protagonists
had (or would) recheck, by asking participants to choose between two knowledge-attribution options explicitly conditioned
on ‘without checking’.
sample:
n_final: 346
recruitment: other
recruitment_other: Wenjuanxing (online Chinese survey platform).
compensation: null
compensation_other: null
characteristics: Effective sample aged 17–60 (M=30.91, SD=7.54); 58.7% female; materials delivered in Chinese; average
completion ~2 minutes.
mean_age: 30.91
mean_age_prov:
page: null
quote: The effective sample ranged from 17 to 60 years old (M = 30.91, SD = 7.54), with females comprising 58.7%.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
provenance:
page: null
quote: Four hundred fifty questionnaires were collected in total, and 346 were deemed effective… The experiments were
conducted via the online survey platform Wenjuanxing (http://www.wjx.cn), with all materials delivered in Chinese.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
design: Between-Subjects
design_other: Same 3×2 between-subjects design as Experiments 1–2; participants choose between two options (knows without
checking vs does not know without checking).
manipulated_factors:
- Stakes (low vs high)
- Scenario (Bank vs Airport vs Spelling)
paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
paradigm_other: null
scale:
label: binary
points: 2
anchors: 'A: Knows without checking; B: Does not know without checking.'
direction: null
provenance:
page: null
quote: “…participants needed to decide whether ‘John knows… without checking…’ or ‘John does not know… without checking…’.”
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
measures:
knowledge_question_text: 'Choose between two statements describing the protagonist’s epistemic state ‘without checking’
(A: knows vs B: does not know).'
knowledge_question_first: null
additional_question_text: null
scenarios:
- scenario_code: bank
scenario_type: DeRose-style bank deposit / bank-hours vignette (modified).
high_stakes_text: 'High stakes: John must deposit cash by Monday to avoid eviction.'
low_stakes_text: 'Low stakes: depositing the cash is not important.'
provenance:
page: null
quote: The materials in Experiment 3 were primarily the same as those in experiments 1 and 2…
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
- scenario_code: airport
scenario_type: Cohen-style airport/flight vignette (modified; organ courier vs vacation).
high_stakes_text: 'High stakes: organ courier transporting a liver to Chicago; direct flight needed.'
low_stakes_text: 'Low stakes: on vacation flying to a basketball game.'
provenance:
page: null
quote: There were no such phrasing issues in the Airport cases and the Spelling cases, therefore the materials of these
two cases were identical to those in experiments 1 and 2.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
- scenario_code: typos
scenario_type: Pinillos-style spelling/typo vignette (modified; coursework).
high_stakes_text: 'High stakes: any typo could lead to expulsion.'
low_stakes_text: 'Low stakes: typos have no consequence.'
provenance:
page: null
quote: There were no such phrasing issues in the Airport cases and the Spelling cases, therefore the materials of these
two cases were identical to those in experiments 1 and 2.
tei_id: null
table_ref: null
effects:
- effect_id: s3_e1
subgroup: Experiment 3 — Bank (knows without checking)
subgroup_desc: 'Binary: Option A (knows without checking) vs option B (does not know without checking); Bank case'
design: Between-Subjects
design_other: null
moderators: *id001
moderators_coding: *id002
contrast:
group_high: high_stakes
group_low: low_stakes
sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
other_notes: Outcome mean = proportion choosing option A (knows without checking).
groups:
- group_id: low_stakes
label: Low stakes
n: 48
mean: 0.75
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 23
quote: The Bank cases,Count,36,47,12,21
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p23_t7.csv
- group_id: high_stakes
label: High stakes
n: 68
mean: 0.6911764705882353
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 23
quote: The Bank cases,Count,36,47,12,21
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p23_t7.csv
effect_size:
metric: SMD
d: 0.161532267823
v: 0.054715492281
computed_from: groups
needs_review: false
notes: Computed from exact 2×2 table counts (option A vs B) via esc::esc_2x2 (OR -> d) in analysis/effect_sizes.qmd.
quality_flags: []
notes: null
- effect_id: s3_e2
subgroup: Experiment 3 — Airport (knows without checking)
subgroup_desc: 'Binary: Option A (knows without checking) vs option B (does not know without checking); Airport case'
design: Between-Subjects
design_other: null
moderators: *id003
moderators_coding: *id004
contrast:
group_high: high_stakes
group_low: low_stakes
sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
other_notes: Outcome mean = proportion choosing option A (knows without checking).
groups:
- group_id: low_stakes
label: Low stakes
n: 42
mean: 0.8095238095238095
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 23
quote: The Airport cases,Count,34,57,8,16
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p23_t7.csv
- group_id: high_stakes
label: High stakes
n: 73
mean: 0.7808219178082192
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 23
quote: The Airport cases,Count,34,57,8,16
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p23_t7.csv
effect_size:
metric: SMD
d: 0.09728553269
v: 0.071265964114
computed_from: groups
needs_review: false
notes: Computed from exact 2×2 table counts (option A vs B) via esc::esc_2x2 (OR -> d) in analysis/effect_sizes.qmd.
quality_flags: []
notes: null
- effect_id: s3_e3
subgroup: Experiment 3 — Spelling/Typos (knows without checking)
subgroup_desc: 'Binary: Option A (knows without checking) vs option B (does not know without checking); Spelling/typos
case'
design: Between-Subjects
design_other: null
moderators: *id005
moderators_coding: *id006
contrast:
group_high: high_stakes
group_low: low_stakes
sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
other_notes: Outcome mean = proportion choosing option A (knows without checking).
groups:
- group_id: low_stakes
label: Low stakes
n: 64
mean: 0.515625
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 23
quote: The Spelling cases,Count,33,25,31,26
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p23_t7.csv
- group_id: high_stakes
label: High stakes
n: 51
mean: 0.49019607843137253
sd: null
se: null
provenance:
page: 23
quote: The Spelling cases,Count,33,25,31,26
tei_id: null
table_ref: camelot_stream_p23_t7.csv
effect_size:
metric: SMD
d: 0.056092791816
v: 0.042865740373
computed_from: groups
needs_review: false
notes: Computed from exact 2×2 table counts (option A vs B) via esc::esc_2x2 (OR -> d) in analysis/effect_sizes.qmd.
quality_flags: []
notes: null
notes: null