Extraction report: shurakovndstakeseffectnew

Summary

• Pipeline outputs used (preferred sources):
• Extraction index/status: papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/out/bundle.json
• Study methods + coding details + retraction rates: papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/out/fulltext.md
• Table-based numeric values (means/SDs and reported d): papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/out/tables/tabula_stream_p12_t2.csv
• Additional table context (binary χ² tests): papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/out/tables/tabula_stream_p10_t1.csv
• Paper metadata cross-check (year/DOI): papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/out/tei.xml and rendered page image papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/out/images/pages/p001.png
• Output YAML: papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/shurakovndstakeseffectnew.yaml
• Effect sizes:
• Sampling variances v for s1_e1, s2_e1, s3_e1 computed in papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/analysis/effect_sizes.qmd from reported d + n_low/n_high=100.

Manual interventions / non-pipeline sources (required disclosure)

• External dataset used (public OSF project linked in the paper):
• Source: https://osf.io/tys3p
• Downloaded into papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/data/:
  • papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/data/Experiment_1_analized_responses.csv
  • papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/data/Experiment_1_all_responses.csv
  • papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/data/Experiment_2_analyzed_responses.csv
  • papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/data/Experiment_2_all_responses.csv
• Used to reproduce the Table 2 descriptives (means/SDs) and sanity-check the reported Cohen’s d values (see analysis/effect_sizes.qmd output).

Notes / potential limitations

• Experiments were extracted at the “subcondition” granularity recommended by docs/extraction_instructions.md:
• Separate studies[] entries for Experiment 1 first-person vs third-person, plus Experiment 2 (modified design).
• Moderator coding update: after clarifying that awareness, evidence, and evidence_reliability are coded from the subject of the target knowledge attribution, third-person Experiment 1 effects s2_e1 and s5_e1 are coded awareness: No. Peter's evidence remains First Person because his basis is his own remembered prior bank visit.
• Reported p-values in Table 2 are thresholds (“< .001”), so reported_test.p is set to null and the threshold is preserved in reported_test.notes.
• OSF data check vs Table 2:
• Means and SDs for Neutral/Stakes match Table 2 when using the “first 100 valid responses per condition” rule described in the paper.
• For Experiment 1 (first-person), the Table 2 reported d=1.06 does not match d≈1.17 when computed from those reproduced means/SDs using a standard pooled-SD Cohen’s d formula. This is flagged with effect_size.needs_review: true for s1_e1.

Open questions (human input requested)

Q1 — Which d should be used for Experiment 1 (first-person) Stakes vs Neutral?

• Current YAML uses the paper’s Table 2 reported d=1.06 (with needs_review: true).
• OSF data check suggests d≈1.17 (pooled-SD) for the same comparison (means/SDs reproduce cleanly).
• If you want, I can update the extraction to use a computed-from-groups d (from OSF data or from Table 2 means/SDs) for s1_e1 for consistency.

Validation / rendering

• YAML schema validation: papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/shurakovndstakeseffectnew.yaml validates against docs/stakes_meta_schema.json (via jsonschema).
• Quarto computation record: papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/analysis/effect_sizes.html rendered from papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/analysis/effect_sizes.qmd.
• HTML extraction report: papers/shurakovndstakeseffectnew/shurakovndstakeseffectnew.html generated via invoke render-extraction shurakovndstakeseffectnew.