Please log in to access this page.
roseetal2019nothingstakeknowledge
/data/papers/roseetal2019nothingstakeknowledge/out/tables/tabula_stream_p12_t3.csv"Indeed |
only two" |
linguistic |
communities |
(11%)—Germany |
and |
USA—out |
of |
the nineteen sampled |
|
displayed |
evidence of |
"a significant |
small-sized" |
effect |
of |
stakes on Strict Knowledge Attribution (Figures 5 and 6). But despite |
|
|
|
|
"this |
" |
there |
was no interaction |
between |
stakes |
and site |
on Strict Knowledge |
Attribution |
|
|
"(see Table 5).5 So |
on" |
|
our first way |
of looking |
at whether a stakes |
effect might |
|
"be masked by projection |
we find virtually no evidence that stakes affect knowledge" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
attribution. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On the second way |
|
of looking |
at whether |
the lack of a stakes |
effect might |
|
|
be due to protagonist |
|
"projection |
" |
we looked |
at whether there |
was an |
effect |
of stakes on Strict Knowledge |
|
Attribution |
among |
those who attributed |
knowl- |
|
|
edge on Knowledge |
Attribution. |
|
Here we find |
a marginally significant |
|
effect |