schema_version: '1.2'
paper:
  paper_id: porteretalndpuzzleaboutknowledge
  citation: Porter, B., Barr, K., Bencherifa, A., et al. (2025). A puzzle about knowledge ascriptions. Noûs.
  short_label: Porter et al. 2025
  doi: 10.1111/nous.12515
  published: 'Yes'
  year: 2025
  language: English
  language_other: null
  research_objective: Test cross-culturally whether stakes (high vs low) affect (a) knowledge ascriptions in an
    evidence-fixed prompt and (b) evidence requirements for knowledge in an evidence-seeking prompt, and interpret
    any divergence between the prompts as reflecting a tension between epistemic beliefs and epistemic practices.
  data_availability:
    data_available_online: 'Yes'
    url: https://osf.io/tyge9/files/osfstorage
    notes: Paper states that data and code are available at this OSF location.
  notes: null
studies:
- study_id: 1
  label: Cross-cultural dam study (15 site samples)
  language: other
  language_other: multiple site languages
  objective: Test cross-culturally whether stakes affect evidence-fixed knowledge ascription and evidence-seeking
    judgments in a dam vignette; site-level weak/strong evidence contrasts are extracted as effects.
  sample:
    n_final: 3516
    recruitment: other
    recruitment_other: Multi-site/cross-cultural sample; site-level recruitment is stored in each effect.sample
      override.
    compensation: null
    compensation_other: Mixed or site-specific; site-level compensation is stored in each effect.sample override
      when available.
    characteristics: Multi-site sample across 15 site/language samples included in this extraction. The study-level
      n_final is the sum of site-level passed-comprehension Ns; site-specific language, recruitment, compensation,
      N, and demographic details are stored in each effect.sample override.
    provenance:
      page: 4
      quote: 'Data was collected from convenience samples across 17 sites in 11 countries... Participants were randomly
        and evenly assigned to one of four conditions, based on a 2 × 2 design (Evidence: weak vs. strong; Stakes:
        low vs. high).'
      table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
  design: Between-Subjects
  design_other: '2 (Evidence: weak vs strong) × 2 (Stakes: low vs high) between-subjects design within each site;
    site/language is an effect-level sample descriptor, not a separate paper-reported study.'
  manipulated_factors:
  - 'Evidence: weak vs strong'
  paradigm: Other
  paradigm_other: 'Mixed DVs: evidence-fixed knowledge ascription (binary) and evidence-seeking checks-required
    free response (numeric; coded).'
  scale:
    label: other
    points: null
    anchors: 'Evidence-fixed: binary choice (knows vs only thinks he knows); Evidence-seeking: numeric free response
      (# checks).'
    direction: 'Evidence-fixed: higher probability of selecting ''knows''; Evidence-seeking: higher numbers = more
      checks required.'
    provenance:
      page: 5
      quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows. Evidence-seeking:
        How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
  measures:
    knowledge_question_text: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. (options: knows / only
      thinks he knows)'
    knowledge_question_first: null
    additional_question_text: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before
      he knows that the dam is secure?'
  scenarios:
  - scenario_code: dam
    scenario_type: Dam-on-river vignette; stakes (high vs low) and evidence (weak vs strong) manipulated.
    high_stakes_text: "PAGE 3 and 5: full vignettes\r\n\r\nIt is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the\
      \ high water level, if it breaks, his kids will be swept away by the water."
    low_stakes_text: It is not at all important that the dam is secure. Due to the low water level, if it breaks,
      the water won't even rise to knee level.
    provenance:
      page: 5
      quote: 'High stakes: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks,
        his kids will be swept away by the water. Low stakes: It is not at all important that the dam is secure.
        Due to the low water level, if it breaks, the water won''t even rise to knee level.'
  effects:
  - effect_id: s1_e1
    site_id: 1
    site_label: China (Mandarin)
    language: other
    language_other: Mandarin
    sample:
      n_final: 261
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: If you participate in this study, you will receive a payment of $1.00 (info in OSF materials),
        but we do not know if it applied to all groups (probably not)
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 22.75 (sd 5.53, range 18–52); Gender % M/F/other: 43.9/55.8/0.3;
        Total N=416; Passed comprehension check N=261 (62.7%).'
      mean_age: 22.75
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'China: Age mean 22.75 (range 18–52; sd 5.53).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'China: N=416; Passed Check=261 (62.7%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: China (Mandarin) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist. The protagonist has
          to be aware of the water levels.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: 'Reliability is manipulated: checked once'
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=9, low_no=29, high_yes=9,
        high_no=79; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.552515367598915
      v: 0.0818765974028145
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 38
      mean: 0.236842105263158
      sd: 0.430851484182746
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 88
      mean: 0.102272727272727
      sd: 0.304743069745636
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s1_e2
    site_id: 1
    site_label: China (Mandarin)
    language: other
    language_other: Mandarin
    sample:
      n_final: 261
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: If you participate in this study, you will receive a payment of $1.00 (info in OSF materials),
        but we do not know if it applied to all groups (probably not)
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 22.75 (sd 5.53, range 18–52); Gender % M/F/other: 43.9/55.8/0.3;
        Total N=416; Passed comprehension check N=261 (62.7%).'
      mean_age: 22.75
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'China: Age mean 22.75 (range 18–52; sd 5.53).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'China: N=416; Passed Check=261 (62.7%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: China (Mandarin) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=7, low_no=37,
        high_yes=23, high_no=68; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.320318931519335
      v: 0.0693244543058392
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 44
      mean: 0.159090909090909
      sd: 0.369989429024468
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 91
      mean: 0.252747252747253
      sd: 0.436994955307943
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s1_e3
    site_id: 1
    site_label: China (Mandarin)
    language: other
    language_other: Mandarin
    sample:
      n_final: 261
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: If you participate in this study, you will receive a payment of $1.00 (info in OSF materials),
        but we do not know if it applied to all groups (probably not)
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 22.75 (sd 5.53, range 18–52); Gender % M/F/other: 43.9/55.8/0.3;
        Total N=416; Passed comprehension check N=261 (62.7%).'
      mean_age: 22.75
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'China: Age mean 22.75 (range 18–52; sd 5.53).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'China: N=416; Passed Check=261 (62.7%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: China (Mandarin) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=31, n_high=57, mean_low=3.48387096774194,
        mean_high=4.78947368421053, sd_low=2.46131357533514, sd_high=3.14947184974415.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.445926217287843
      v: 0.0509317547974373
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 31
      mean: 3.48387096774194
      sd: 2.46131357533514
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 57
      mean: 4.78947368421053
      sd: 3.14947184974415
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s1_e4
    site_id: 1
    site_label: China (Mandarin)
    language: other
    language_other: Mandarin
    sample:
      n_final: 261
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: If you participate in this study, you will receive a payment of $1.00 (info in OSF materials),
        but we do not know if it applied to all groups (probably not)
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 22.75 (sd 5.53, range 18–52); Gender % M/F/other: 43.9/55.8/0.3;
        Total N=416; Passed comprehension check N=261 (62.7%).'
      mean_age: 22.75
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'China: Age mean 22.75 (range 18–52; sd 5.53).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'China: N=416; Passed Check=261 (62.7%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: China (Mandarin) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=36, n_high=58, mean_low=4.61111111111111,
        mean_high=4.72413793103448, sd_low=4.7285018937006, sd_high=5.01154142848417.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.0230394819994714
      v: 0.0450219805866907
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 36
      mean: 4.61111111111111
      sd: 4.7285018937006
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 58
      mean: 4.72413793103448
      sd: 5.01154142848417
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s2_e1
    site_id: 2
    site_label: Russia (Russian)
    language: other
    language_other: Russian
    sample:
      n_final: 558
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 25.97 (sd 10.28, range 18–75); Gender % M/F/other: 40/60/0;
        Total N=739; Passed comprehension check N=558 (75.5%).'
      mean_age: 25.97
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Russia: Age mean 25.97 (range 18–75; sd 10.28).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Russia: N=739; Passed Check=558 (75.5%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Russia (Russian) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=32, low_no=72, high_yes=52,
        high_no=125; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.0364647842582463
      v: 0.0219977382614252
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 104
      mean: 0.307692307692308
      sd: 0.463773527692987
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 177
      mean: 0.293785310734463
      sd: 0.456786974431487
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s2_e2
    site_id: 2
    site_label: Russia (Russian)
    language: other
    language_other: Russian
    sample:
      n_final: 558
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 25.97 (sd 10.28, range 18–75); Gender % M/F/other: 40/60/0;
        Total N=739; Passed comprehension check N=558 (75.5%).'
      mean_age: 25.97
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Russia: Age mean 25.97 (range 18–75; sd 10.28).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Russia: N=739; Passed Check=558 (75.5%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Russia (Russian) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=48, low_no=70,
        high_yes=49, high_no=110; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.237824450182473
      v: 0.0196415532019087
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 118
      mean: 0.406779661016949
      sd: 0.493327930247495
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 159
      mean: 0.308176100628931
      sd: 0.463198641460142
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s2_e3
    site_id: 2
    site_label: Russia (Russian)
    language: other
    language_other: Russian
    sample:
      n_final: 558
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 25.97 (sd 10.28, range 18–75); Gender % M/F/other: 40/60/0;
        Total N=739; Passed comprehension check N=558 (75.5%).'
      mean_age: 25.97
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Russia: Age mean 25.97 (range 18–75; sd 10.28).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Russia: N=739; Passed Check=558 (75.5%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Russia (Russian) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=103, n_high=167, mean_low=2.1747572815534,
        mean_high=8.18562874251497, sd_low=2.63247883057991, sd_high=20.1014363673349.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.37796129506215
      v: 0.0159613076320347
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 103
      mean: 2.1747572815534
      sd: 2.63247883057991
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 167
      mean: 8.18562874251497
      sd: 20.1014363673349
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s2_e4
    site_id: 2
    site_label: Russia (Russian)
    language: other
    language_other: Russian
    sample:
      n_final: 558
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 25.97 (sd 10.28, range 18–75); Gender % M/F/other: 40/60/0;
        Total N=739; Passed comprehension check N=558 (75.5%).'
      mean_age: 25.97
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Russia: Age mean 25.97 (range 18–75; sd 10.28).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Russia: N=739; Passed Check=558 (75.5%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Russia (Russian) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=115, n_high=145, mean_low=4.4695652173913,
        mean_high=10.5655172413793, sd_low=9.84914435604169, sd_high=22.6868212457706.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.335503596949632
      v: 0.0158086705587551
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 115
      mean: 4.4695652173913
      sd: 9.84914435604169
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 145
      mean: 10.5655172413793
      sd: 22.6868212457706
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s3_e1
    site_id: 3
    site_label: Slovakia (Slovak)
    language: other
    language_other: Slovak
    sample:
      n_final: 290
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students and non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: both; Age mean 26.28 (sd 9.07, range 18–74); Gender % M/F/other: 54.4/44.9/0.7;
        Total N=713; Passed comprehension check N=290 (40.7%).'
      mean_age: 26.28
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Slovakia: Age mean 26.28 (range 18–74; sd 9.07).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Slovakia: N=713; Passed Check=290 (40.7%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Slovakia (Slovak) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=19, low_no=24, high_yes=19,
        high_no=79; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.656849950227036
      v: 0.0485089510959194
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 43
      mean: 0.441860465116279
      sd: 0.502485516559592
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 98
      mean: 0.193877551020408
      sd: 0.397366673881274
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s3_e2
    site_id: 3
    site_label: Slovakia (Slovak)
    language: other
    language_other: Slovak
    sample:
      n_final: 290
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students and non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: both; Age mean 26.28 (sd 9.07, range 18–74); Gender % M/F/other: 54.4/44.9/0.7;
        Total N=713; Passed comprehension check N=290 (40.7%).'
      mean_age: 26.28
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Slovakia: Age mean 26.28 (range 18–74; sd 9.07).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Slovakia: N=713; Passed Check=290 (40.7%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Slovakia (Slovak) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=26, low_no=22,
        high_yes=32, high_no=69; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.515726659136653
      v: 0.039411560667506
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 48
      mean: 0.541666666666667
      sd: 0.503533612870859
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 101
      mean: 0.316831683168317
      sd: 0.467561612395777
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s3_e3
    site_id: 3
    site_label: Slovakia (Slovak)
    language: other
    language_other: Slovak
    sample:
      n_final: 290
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students and non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: both; Age mean 26.28 (sd 9.07, range 18–74); Gender % M/F/other: 54.4/44.9/0.7;
        Total N=713; Passed comprehension check N=290 (40.7%).'
      mean_age: 26.28
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Slovakia: Age mean 26.28 (range 18–74; sd 9.07).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Slovakia: N=713; Passed Check=290 (40.7%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Slovakia (Slovak) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=35, n_high=85, mean_low=3.57142857142857,
        mean_high=11.5411764705882, sd_low=11.070059552116, sd_high=22.8663575613443.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.394792312363619
      v: 0.0409855551617041
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 35
      mean: 3.57142857142857
      sd: 11.070059552116
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 85
      mean: 11.5411764705882
      sd: 22.8663575613443
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s3_e4
    site_id: 3
    site_label: Slovakia (Slovak)
    language: other
    language_other: Slovak
    sample:
      n_final: 290
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students and non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: both; Age mean 26.28 (sd 9.07, range 18–74); Gender % M/F/other: 54.4/44.9/0.7;
        Total N=713; Passed comprehension check N=290 (40.7%).'
      mean_age: 26.28
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Slovakia: Age mean 26.28 (range 18–74; sd 9.07).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Slovakia: N=713; Passed Check=290 (40.7%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Slovakia (Slovak) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=41, n_high=82, mean_low=2.46341463414634,
        mean_high=11.7317073170732, sd_low=2.48090266813926, sd_high=25.379611132691.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.445289756137204
      v: 0.0373913941744745
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 41
      mean: 2.46341463414634
      sd: 2.48090266813926
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 82
      mean: 11.7317073170732
      sd: 25.379611132691
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s4_e1
    site_id: 4
    site_label: Ecuador (Spanish)
    language: other
    language_other: Spanish
    sample:
      n_final: 208
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: students; Age mean 21.39 (sd 3.21, range 18–42); Gender % M/F/other: 32.9/66.7/0.5;
        Total N=390; Passed comprehension check N=208 (53.3%).'
      mean_age: 21.39
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Ecuador: Age mean 21.39 (range 18–42; sd 3.21).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Ecuador: N=390; Passed Check=208 (53.3%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Ecuador (Spanish) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=8, low_no=30, high_yes=21,
        high_no=41; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.359855794346364
      v: 0.07001576218072
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 38
      mean: 0.210526315789474
      sd: 0.413154950112274
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 62
      mean: 0.338709677419355
      sd: 0.477134492745083
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s4_e2
    site_id: 4
    site_label: Ecuador (Spanish)
    language: other
    language_other: Spanish
    sample:
      n_final: 208
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: students; Age mean 21.39 (sd 3.21, range 18–42); Gender % M/F/other: 32.9/66.7/0.5;
        Total N=390; Passed comprehension check N=208 (53.3%).'
      mean_age: 21.39
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Ecuador: Age mean 21.39 (range 18–42; sd 3.21).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Ecuador: N=390; Passed Check=208 (53.3%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Ecuador (Spanish) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=18, low_no=24,
        high_yes=23, high_no=43; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.18636230333852
      v: 0.0498367382467262
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 42
      mean: 0.428571428571429
      sd: 0.500870322677809
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 66
      mean: 0.348484848484849
      sd: 0.480141781702166
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s4_e3
    site_id: 4
    site_label: Ecuador (Spanish)
    language: other
    language_other: Spanish
    sample:
      n_final: 208
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: students; Age mean 21.39 (sd 3.21, range 18–42); Gender % M/F/other: 32.9/66.7/0.5;
        Total N=390; Passed comprehension check N=208 (53.3%).'
      mean_age: 21.39
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Ecuador: Age mean 21.39 (range 18–42; sd 3.21).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Ecuador: N=390; Passed Check=208 (53.3%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Ecuador (Spanish) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=38, n_high=53, mean_low=2.71052631578947,
        mean_high=6.20754716981132, sd_low=2.3122224565292, sd_high=13.4455575885838.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.336736969823536
      v: 0.0458067457978429
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 38
      mean: 2.71052631578947
      sd: 2.3122224565292
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 53
      mean: 6.20754716981132
      sd: 13.4455575885838
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s4_e4
    site_id: 4
    site_label: Ecuador (Spanish)
    language: other
    language_other: Spanish
    sample:
      n_final: 208
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: students; Age mean 21.39 (sd 3.21, range 18–42); Gender % M/F/other: 32.9/66.7/0.5;
        Total N=390; Passed comprehension check N=208 (53.3%).'
      mean_age: 21.39
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Ecuador: Age mean 21.39 (range 18–42; sd 3.21).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Ecuador: N=390; Passed Check=208 (53.3%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Ecuador (Spanish) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=36, n_high=45, mean_low=3.05555555555556,
        mean_high=9.97777777777778, sd_low=2.56286050503221, sd_high=19.8705914366031.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.463732339101942
      v: 0.0513274548291911
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 36
      mean: 3.05555555555556
      sd: 2.56286050503221
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 45
      mean: 9.97777777777778
      sd: 19.8705914366031
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s5_e1
    site_id: 5
    site_label: India (Hindi)
    language: other
    language_other: Hindi
    sample:
      n_final: 100
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: both; Age mean 29.98 (sd 10.23, range 18–62); Gender % M/F/other: 45.3/53.8/0.9;
        Total N=200; Passed comprehension check N=100 (50%).'
      mean_age: 29.98
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Hindi): Age mean 29.98 (range 18–62; sd 10.23).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Hindi): N=200; Passed Check=100 (50%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: India (Hindi) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=4, low_no=6, high_yes=16,
        high_no=24; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.0
      v: 0.158314349441153
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 10
      mean: 0.4
      sd: 0.516397779494322
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 40
      mean: 0.4
      sd: 0.496138938356834
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s5_e2
    site_id: 5
    site_label: India (Hindi)
    language: other
    language_other: Hindi
    sample:
      n_final: 100
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: both; Age mean 29.98 (sd 10.23, range 18–62); Gender % M/F/other: 45.3/53.8/0.9;
        Total N=200; Passed comprehension check N=100 (50%).'
      mean_age: 29.98
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Hindi): Age mean 29.98 (range 18–62; sd 10.23).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Hindi): N=200; Passed Check=100 (50%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: India (Hindi) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=7, low_no=5, high_yes=17,
        high_no=21; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.302007675760594
      v: 0.136570738287655
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 12
      mean: 0.583333333333333
      sd: 0.514928650544437
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 38
      mean: 0.447368421052632
      sd: 0.503896622873567
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s5_e3
    site_id: 5
    site_label: India (Hindi)
    language: other
    language_other: Hindi
    sample:
      n_final: 100
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: both; Age mean 29.98 (sd 10.23, range 18–62); Gender % M/F/other: 45.3/53.8/0.9;
        Total N=200; Passed comprehension check N=100 (50%).'
      mean_age: 29.98
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Hindi): Age mean 29.98 (range 18–62; sd 10.23).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Hindi): N=200; Passed Check=100 (50%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: India (Hindi) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=10, n_high=34, mean_low=2.6, mean_high=4.97058823529412,
        sd_low=2.98886823619465, sd_high=2.77963692983015.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.838915625663936
      v: 0.137409258194327
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 10
      mean: 2.6
      sd: 2.98886823619465
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 34
      mean: 4.97058823529412
      sd: 2.77963692983015
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s5_e4
    site_id: 5
    site_label: India (Hindi)
    language: other
    language_other: Hindi
    sample:
      n_final: 100
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: both; Age mean 29.98 (sd 10.23, range 18–62); Gender % M/F/other: 45.3/53.8/0.9;
        Total N=200; Passed comprehension check N=100 (50%).'
      mean_age: 29.98
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Hindi): Age mean 29.98 (range 18–62; sd 10.23).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Hindi): N=200; Passed Check=100 (50%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: India (Hindi) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=12, n_high=28, mean_low=3.08333333333333,
        mean_high=7.28571428571429, sd_low=3.50216383328243, sd_high=3.25300024316178.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -1.26309671009282
      v: 0.13899028528571
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 12
      mean: 3.08333333333333
      sd: 3.50216383328243
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 28
      mean: 7.28571428571429
      sd: 3.25300024316178
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s6_e1
    site_id: 6
    site_label: India (Meitei)
    language: other
    language_other: Meitei
    sample:
      n_final: 42
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 23.26 (sd 6.26, range 18–45); Gender % M/F/other: 47.6/50/2.4;
        Total N=86; Passed comprehension check N=42 (48.8%).'
      mean_age: 23.26
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Meitei): Age mean 23.26 (range 18–45; sd 6.26).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Meitei): N=86; Passed Check=42 (48.8%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: India (Meitei) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=0, low_no=0, high_yes=17,
        high_no=3; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: null
      v: null
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: true
      notes: Missing one stakes group in this evidence stratum.
    quality_flags:
    - insufficient_data_for_split_effect
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 0
      mean: null
      sd: null
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 20
      mean: 0.85
      sd: 0.366347548532523
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s6_e2
    site_id: 6
    site_label: India (Meitei)
    language: other
    language_other: Meitei
    sample:
      n_final: 42
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 23.26 (sd 6.26, range 18–45); Gender % M/F/other: 47.6/50/2.4;
        Total N=86; Passed comprehension check N=42 (48.8%).'
      mean_age: 23.26
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Meitei): Age mean 23.26 (range 18–45; sd 6.26).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Meitei): N=86; Passed Check=42 (48.8%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: India (Meitei) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=1, low_no=1, high_yes=14,
        high_no=6; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.467139793460525
      v: 0.680299375884268
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 2
      mean: 0.5
      sd: 0.707106781186548
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 20
      mean: 0.7
      sd: 0.470162345981627
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s6_e3
    site_id: 6
    site_label: India (Meitei)
    language: other
    language_other: Meitei
    sample:
      n_final: 42
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 23.26 (sd 6.26, range 18–45); Gender % M/F/other: 47.6/50/2.4;
        Total N=86; Passed comprehension check N=42 (48.8%).'
      mean_age: 23.26
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Meitei): Age mean 23.26 (range 18–45; sd 6.26).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Meitei): N=86; Passed Check=42 (48.8%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: India (Meitei) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=0, n_high=18, mean_low=None, mean_high=7.61111111111111,
        sd_low=None, sd_high=3.1462188115987.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: null
      v: null
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: true
      notes: Insufficient per-group data for esc_mean_sd (need n>=2 and finite SD in both stakes groups).
    quality_flags:
    - insufficient_data_for_split_effect
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 0
      mean: null
      sd: null
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 18
      mean: 7.61111111111111
      sd: 3.1462188115987
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s6_e4
    site_id: 6
    site_label: India (Meitei)
    language: other
    language_other: Meitei
    sample:
      n_final: 42
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 23.26 (sd 6.26, range 18–45); Gender % M/F/other: 47.6/50/2.4;
        Total N=86; Passed comprehension check N=42 (48.8%).'
      mean_age: 23.26
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Meitei): Age mean 23.26 (range 18–45; sd 6.26).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'India (Meitei): N=86; Passed Check=42 (48.8%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: India (Meitei) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=2, n_high=17, mean_low=5.0,
        mean_high=7.70588235294118, sd_low=0.0, sd_high=3.78755702733228.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.736400711009846
      v: 0.573094213811128
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 2
      mean: 5.0
      sd: 0.0
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 17
      mean: 7.70588235294118
      sd: 3.78755702733228
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s7_e1
    site_id: 7
    site_label: Japan (Japanese)
    language: other
    language_other: Japanese
    sample:
      n_final: 445
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 30.31 (sd 10.76, range 19–62); Gender % M/F/other: 53.3/46.3/0.4;
        Total N=544; Passed comprehension check N=445 (81.8%).'
      mean_age: 30.31
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Japan: Age mean 30.31 (range 19–62; sd 10.76).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Japan: N=544; Passed Check=445 (81.8%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Japan (Japanese) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=18, low_no=78, high_yes=16,
        high_no=116; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.283749355205253
      v: 0.0424019299139823
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 96
      mean: 0.1875
      sd: 0.392361272835448
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 132
      mean: 0.121212121212121
      sd: 0.327616957271215
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s7_e2
    site_id: 7
    site_label: Japan (Japanese)
    language: other
    language_other: Japanese
    sample:
      n_final: 445
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 30.31 (sd 10.76, range 19–62); Gender % M/F/other: 53.3/46.3/0.4;
        Total N=544; Passed comprehension check N=445 (81.8%).'
      mean_age: 30.31
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Japan: Age mean 30.31 (range 19–62; sd 10.76).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Japan: N=544; Passed Check=445 (81.8%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Japan (Japanese) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=27, low_no=58,
        high_yes=25, high_no=107; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.380056845671382
      v: 0.0314979830585107
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 85
      mean: 0.317647058823529
      sd: 0.468324386608723
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 132
      mean: 0.189393939393939
      sd: 0.393313886219085
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s7_e3
    site_id: 7
    site_label: Japan (Japanese)
    language: other
    language_other: Japanese
    sample:
      n_final: 445
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 30.31 (sd 10.76, range 19–62); Gender % M/F/other: 53.3/46.3/0.4;
        Total N=544; Passed comprehension check N=445 (81.8%).'
      mean_age: 30.31
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Japan: Age mean 30.31 (range 19–62; sd 10.76).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Japan: N=544; Passed Check=445 (81.8%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Japan (Japanese) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=88, n_high=110, mean_low=4.29545454545455,
        mean_high=9.49090909090909, sd_low=12.1675648456777, sd_high=20.3581444399418.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.301876109494476
      v: 0.0206846696603119
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 88
      mean: 4.29545454545455
      sd: 12.1675648456777
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 110
      mean: 9.49090909090909
      sd: 20.3581444399418
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s7_e4
    site_id: 7
    site_label: Japan (Japanese)
    language: other
    language_other: Japanese
    sample:
      n_final: 445
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 30.31 (sd 10.76, range 19–62); Gender % M/F/other: 53.3/46.3/0.4;
        Total N=544; Passed comprehension check N=445 (81.8%).'
      mean_age: 30.31
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Japan: Age mean 30.31 (range 19–62; sd 10.76).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Japan: N=544; Passed Check=445 (81.8%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Japan (Japanese) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=71, n_high=111, mean_low=8.16901408450704,
        mean_high=17.5585585585586, sd_low=19.6301414851847, sd_high=29.6091769203968.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.358594182611733
      v: 0.0234467846990729
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 71
      mean: 8.16901408450704
      sd: 19.6301414851847
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 111
      mean: 17.5585585585586
      sd: 29.6091769203968
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s8_e1
    site_id: 8
    site_label: Morocco (Arabic)
    language: other
    language_other: Arabic
    sample:
      n_final: 323
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 32.96 (sd 11.81, range 18–76); Gender % M/F/other: 44.4/55.6/0;
        Total N=551; Passed comprehension check N=323 (58.6%).'
      mean_age: 32.96
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Morocco: Age mean 32.96 (range 18–76; sd 11.81).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Morocco: N=551; Passed Check=323 (58.6%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Morocco (Arabic) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=25, low_no=17, high_yes=41,
        high_no=76; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.552885712812783
      v: 0.0414520164666358
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 42
      mean: 0.595238095238095
      sd: 0.496795772414547
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 117
      mean: 0.35042735042735
      sd: 0.479155854642943
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s8_e2
    site_id: 8
    site_label: Morocco (Arabic)
    language: other
    language_other: Arabic
    sample:
      n_final: 323
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 32.96 (sd 11.81, range 18–76); Gender % M/F/other: 44.4/55.6/0;
        Total N=551; Passed comprehension check N=323 (58.6%).'
      mean_age: 32.96
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Morocco: Age mean 32.96 (range 18–76; sd 11.81).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Morocco: N=551; Passed Check=323 (58.6%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Morocco (Arabic) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=14, low_no=35,
        high_yes=48, high_no=67; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.321313996951993
      v: 0.0412656984871685
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 49
      mean: 0.285714285714286
      sd: 0.456435464587638
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 115
      mean: 0.417391304347826
      sd: 0.495286709376626
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s8_e3
    site_id: 8
    site_label: Morocco (Arabic)
    language: other
    language_other: Arabic
    sample:
      n_final: 323
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 32.96 (sd 11.81, range 18–76); Gender % M/F/other: 44.4/55.6/0;
        Total N=551; Passed comprehension check N=323 (58.6%).'
      mean_age: 32.96
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Morocco: Age mean 32.96 (range 18–76; sd 11.81).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Morocco: N=551; Passed Check=323 (58.6%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Morocco (Arabic) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=41, n_high=108, mean_low=1.58536585365854,
        mean_high=3.5, sd_low=1.9745329796701, sd_high=2.75985913225776.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.744981969167287
      v: 0.0355119130086257
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 41
      mean: 1.58536585365854
      sd: 1.9745329796701
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 108
      mean: 3.5
      sd: 2.75985913225776
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s8_e4
    site_id: 8
    site_label: Morocco (Arabic)
    language: other
    language_other: Arabic
    sample:
      n_final: 323
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 32.96 (sd 11.81, range 18–76); Gender % M/F/other: 44.4/55.6/0;
        Total N=551; Passed comprehension check N=323 (58.6%).'
      mean_age: 32.96
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Morocco: Age mean 32.96 (range 18–76; sd 11.81).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Morocco: N=551; Passed Check=323 (58.6%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Morocco (Arabic) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=47, n_high=105, mean_low=5.17021276595745,
        mean_high=7.96190476190476, sd_low=4.41006333847925, sd_high=13.3113050633979.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.245969711197567
      v: 0.0309994220409463
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 47
      mean: 5.17021276595745
      sd: 4.41006333847925
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 105
      mean: 7.96190476190476
      sd: 13.3113050633979
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s9_e1
    site_id: 9
    site_label: Peru (Shipibo)
    language: other
    language_other: Shipibo
    sample:
      n_final: 102
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 34.68 (sd 13.77, range 18–83); Gender % M/F/other: 53.9/46.1/0;
        Total N=200; Passed comprehension check N=102 (51%).'
      mean_age: 34.68
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Shipibo): Age mean 34.68 (range 18–83; sd 13.77).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Shipibo): N=200; Passed Check=102 (51%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Peru (Shipibo) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=4, low_no=4, high_yes=36,
        high_no=7; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.902861044993359
      v: 0.203848571851846
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 8
      mean: 0.5
      sd: 0.534522483824849
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 43
      mean: 0.837209302325581
      sd: 0.373543683818814
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s9_e2
    site_id: 9
    site_label: Peru (Shipibo)
    language: other
    language_other: Shipibo
    sample:
      n_final: 102
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 34.68 (sd 13.77, range 18–83); Gender % M/F/other: 53.9/46.1/0;
        Total N=200; Passed comprehension check N=102 (51%).'
      mean_age: 34.68
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Shipibo): Age mean 34.68 (range 18–83; sd 13.77).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Shipibo): N=200; Passed Check=102 (51%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Peru (Shipibo) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=0, low_no=5, high_yes=37,
        high_no=9; 0.5 continuity correction applied.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -2.07903061470105
      v: 0.703295059969437
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 with 0.5 continuity correction.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 5
      mean: 0.0
      sd: 0.0
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 46
      mean: 0.804347826086957
      sd: 0.40108548367822
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s9_e3
    site_id: 9
    site_label: Peru (Shipibo)
    language: other
    language_other: Shipibo
    sample:
      n_final: 102
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 34.68 (sd 13.77, range 18–83); Gender % M/F/other: 53.9/46.1/0;
        Total N=200; Passed comprehension check N=102 (51%).'
      mean_age: 34.68
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Shipibo): Age mean 34.68 (range 18–83; sd 13.77).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Shipibo): N=200; Passed Check=102 (51%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Peru (Shipibo) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=0, n_high=1, mean_low=None, mean_high=5.0,
        sd_low=None, sd_high=None.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: null
      v: null
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: true
      notes: Insufficient per-group data for esc_mean_sd (need n>=2 and finite SD in both stakes groups).
    quality_flags:
    - insufficient_data_for_split_effect
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 0
      mean: null
      sd: null
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 1
      mean: 5.0
      sd: null
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s9_e4
    site_id: 9
    site_label: Peru (Shipibo)
    language: other
    language_other: Shipibo
    sample:
      n_final: 102
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 34.68 (sd 13.77, range 18–83); Gender % M/F/other: 53.9/46.1/0;
        Total N=200; Passed comprehension check N=102 (51%).'
      mean_age: 34.68
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Shipibo): Age mean 34.68 (range 18–83; sd 13.77).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Shipibo): N=200; Passed Check=102 (51%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Peru (Shipibo) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=0, n_high=2, mean_low=None,
        mean_high=4.5, sd_low=None, sd_high=0.707106781186548.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: null
      v: null
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: true
      notes: Insufficient per-group data for esc_mean_sd (need n>=2 and finite SD in both stakes groups).
    quality_flags:
    - insufficient_data_for_split_effect
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 0
      mean: null
      sd: null
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 2
      mean: 4.5
      sd: 0.707106781186548
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s10_e1
    site_id: 10
    site_label: Peru (Spanish)
    language: other
    language_other: Spanish
    sample:
      n_final: 216
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: students; Age mean 22.75 (sd 3.28, range 18–49); Gender % M/F/other: 43.1/56.9/0;
        Total N=286; Passed comprehension check N=216 (75.5%).'
      mean_age: 22.75
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Spanish): Age mean 22.75 (range 18–49; sd 3.28).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Spanish): N=286; Passed Check=216 (75.5%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Peru (Spanish) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked only once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=13, low_no=28, high_yes=17,
        high_no=51; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.182686763755891
      v: 0.0580779312183859
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 41
      mean: 0.317073170731707
      sd: 0.471116991321896
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 68
      mean: 0.25
      sd: 0.436232171512701
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s10_e2
    site_id: 10
    site_label: Peru (Spanish)
    language: other
    language_other: Spanish
    sample:
      n_final: 216
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: students; Age mean 22.75 (sd 3.28, range 18–49); Gender % M/F/other: 43.1/56.9/0;
        Total N=286; Passed comprehension check N=216 (75.5%).'
      mean_age: 22.75
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Spanish): Age mean 22.75 (range 18–49; sd 3.28).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Spanish): N=286; Passed Check=216 (75.5%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Peru (Spanish) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=9, low_no=30,
        high_yes=15, high_no=53; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.0321253327534255
      v: 0.0699052443117261
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 39
      mean: 0.230769230769231
      sd: 0.426832794918354
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 68
      mean: 0.220588235294118
      sd: 0.417726191664839
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s10_e3
    site_id: 10
    site_label: Peru (Spanish)
    language: other
    language_other: Spanish
    sample:
      n_final: 216
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: students; Age mean 22.75 (sd 3.28, range 18–49); Gender % M/F/other: 43.1/56.9/0;
        Total N=286; Passed comprehension check N=216 (75.5%).'
      mean_age: 22.75
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Spanish): Age mean 22.75 (range 18–49; sd 3.28).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Spanish): N=286; Passed Check=216 (75.5%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Peru (Spanish) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=27, n_high=35, mean_low=2.22222222222222,
        mean_high=3.77142857142857, sd_low=1.08604197869474, sd_high=2.00126010723412.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.929046137166019
      v: 0.0725691650034906
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 27
      mean: 2.22222222222222
      sd: 1.08604197869474
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 35
      mean: 3.77142857142857
      sd: 2.00126010723412
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s10_e4
    site_id: 10
    site_label: Peru (Spanish)
    language: other
    language_other: Spanish
    sample:
      n_final: 216
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: students; Age mean 22.75 (sd 3.28, range 18–49); Gender % M/F/other: 43.1/56.9/0;
        Total N=286; Passed comprehension check N=216 (75.5%).'
      mean_age: 22.75
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Spanish): Age mean 22.75 (range 18–49; sd 3.28).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'Peru (Spanish): N=286; Passed Check=216 (75.5%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: Peru (Spanish) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=23, n_high=41, mean_low=7.08695652173913,
        mean_high=6.68292682926829, sd_low=20.293109093479, sd_high=15.2846966348538.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.0234501004569504
      v: 0.0678728009220936
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 23
      mean: 7.08695652173913
      sd: 20.293109093479
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 41
      mean: 6.68292682926829
      sd: 15.2846966348538
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s11_e1
    site_id: 11
    site_label: South Africa (Afrikaans)
    language: other
    language_other: Afrikaans
    sample:
      n_final: 178
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 41.63 (sd 12.85, range 18–73); Gender % M/F/other: 34.3/65.7/0;
        Total N=270; Passed comprehension check N=178 (65.9%).'
      mean_age: 41.63
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Afrikaans): Age mean 41.63 (range 18–73; sd 12.85).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Afrikaans): N=270; Passed Check=178 (65.9%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Africa (Afrikaans) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=15, low_no=10, high_yes=30,
        high_no=31; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.241622606983428
      v: 0.0705979860217579
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 25
      mean: 0.6
      sd: 0.5
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 61
      mean: 0.491803278688525
      sd: 0.504081700377764
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s11_e2
    site_id: 11
    site_label: South Africa (Afrikaans)
    language: other
    language_other: Afrikaans
    sample:
      n_final: 178
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 41.63 (sd 12.85, range 18–73); Gender % M/F/other: 34.3/65.7/0;
        Total N=270; Passed comprehension check N=178 (65.9%).'
      mean_age: 41.63
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Afrikaans): Age mean 41.63 (range 18–73; sd 12.85).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Afrikaans): N=270; Passed Check=178 (65.9%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Africa (Afrikaans) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=11, low_no=9,
        high_yes=42, high_no=30; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.0748713136838026
      v: 0.0787761237323111
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 20
      mean: 0.55
      sd: 0.51041778553404
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 72
      mean: 0.583333333333333
      sd: 0.496466386817312
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s11_e3
    site_id: 11
    site_label: South Africa (Afrikaans)
    language: other
    language_other: Afrikaans
    sample:
      n_final: 178
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 41.63 (sd 12.85, range 18–73); Gender % M/F/other: 34.3/65.7/0;
        Total N=270; Passed comprehension check N=178 (65.9%).'
      mean_age: 41.63
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Afrikaans): Age mean 41.63 (range 18–73; sd 12.85).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Afrikaans): N=270; Passed Check=178 (65.9%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Africa (Afrikaans) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=24, n_high=48, mean_low=1.75, mean_high=2.5625,
        sd_low=0.793999233380421, sd_high=1.55613063500192.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.600119731518484
      v: 0.0650009978622071
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 24
      mean: 1.75
      sd: 0.793999233380421
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 48
      mean: 2.5625
      sd: 1.55613063500192
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s11_e4
    site_id: 11
    site_label: South Africa (Afrikaans)
    language: other
    language_other: Afrikaans
    sample:
      n_final: 178
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 41.63 (sd 12.85, range 18–73); Gender % M/F/other: 34.3/65.7/0;
        Total N=270; Passed comprehension check N=178 (65.9%).'
      mean_age: 41.63
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Afrikaans): Age mean 41.63 (range 18–73; sd 12.85).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Afrikaans): N=270; Passed Check=178 (65.9%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Africa (Afrikaans) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=15, n_high=45, mean_low=10.2,
        mean_high=5.31111111111111, sd_low=25.0718966175278, sd_high=3.29477701150708.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.386541332590345
      v: 0.0901340072372282
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 15
      mean: 10.2
      sd: 25.0718966175278
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 45
      mean: 5.31111111111111
      sd: 3.29477701150708
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s12_e1
    site_id: 12
    site_label: South Africa (Sepedi)
    language: other
    language_other: Sepedi
    sample:
      n_final: 122
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 29.33 (sd 7.88, range 18–57); Gender % M/F/other: 36.5/62/1.5;
        Total N=258; Passed comprehension check N=122 (47.3%).'
      mean_age: 29.33
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Sepedi): Age mean 29.33 (range 18–57; sd 7.88).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Sepedi): N=258; Passed Check=122 (47.3%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Africa (Sepedi) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=6, low_no=3, high_yes=40,
        high_no=16; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.123025487666559
      v: 0.17857858616962
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 9
      mean: 0.666666666666667
      sd: 0.5
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 56
      mean: 0.714285714285714
      sd: 0.455842305838552
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s12_e2
    site_id: 12
    site_label: South Africa (Sepedi)
    language: other
    language_other: Sepedi
    sample:
      n_final: 122
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 29.33 (sd 7.88, range 18–57); Gender % M/F/other: 36.5/62/1.5;
        Total N=258; Passed comprehension check N=122 (47.3%).'
      mean_age: 29.33
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Sepedi): Age mean 29.33 (range 18–57; sd 7.88).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Sepedi): N=258; Passed Check=122 (47.3%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Africa (Sepedi) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=1, low_no=3, high_yes=32,
        high_no=21; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.8379238540455
      v: 0.429258050341868
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 4
      mean: 0.25
      sd: 0.5
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 53
      mean: 0.60377358490566
      sd: 0.493793114632085
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s12_e3
    site_id: 12
    site_label: South Africa (Sepedi)
    language: other
    language_other: Sepedi
    sample:
      n_final: 122
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 29.33 (sd 7.88, range 18–57); Gender % M/F/other: 36.5/62/1.5;
        Total N=258; Passed comprehension check N=122 (47.3%).'
      mean_age: 29.33
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Sepedi): Age mean 29.33 (range 18–57; sd 7.88).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Sepedi): N=258; Passed Check=122 (47.3%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Africa (Sepedi) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=1, n_high=10, mean_low=3.0, mean_high=4.1,
        sd_low=None, sd_high=2.28278582243519.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: null
      v: null
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: true
      notes: Insufficient per-group data for esc_mean_sd (need n>=2 and finite SD in both stakes groups).
    quality_flags:
    - insufficient_data_for_split_effect
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 1
      mean: 3.0
      sd: null
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 10
      mean: 4.1
      sd: 2.28278582243519
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s12_e4
    site_id: 12
    site_label: South Africa (Sepedi)
    language: other
    language_other: Sepedi
    sample:
      n_final: 122
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 29.33 (sd 7.88, range 18–57); Gender % M/F/other: 36.5/62/1.5;
        Total N=258; Passed comprehension check N=122 (47.3%).'
      mean_age: 29.33
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Sepedi): Age mean 29.33 (range 18–57; sd 7.88).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (Sepedi): N=258; Passed Check=122 (47.3%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Africa (Sepedi) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=1, n_high=10, mean_low=2.0,
        mean_high=6.3, sd_low=None, sd_high=3.43349514181816.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: null
      v: null
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: true
      notes: Insufficient per-group data for esc_mean_sd (need n>=2 and finite SD in both stakes groups).
    quality_flags:
    - insufficient_data_for_split_effect
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 1
      mean: 2.0
      sd: null
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 10
      mean: 6.3
      sd: 3.43349514181816
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s13_e1
    site_id: 13
    site_label: South Africa (isiZulu)
    language: other
    language_other: isiZulu
    sample:
      n_final: 130
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 31.05 (sd 9.84, range 18–76); Gender % M/F/other: 27.9/69.9/2.2;
        Total N=268; Passed comprehension check N=130 (48.5%).'
      mean_age: 31.05
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (isiZulu): Age mean 31.05 (range 18–76; sd 9.84).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (isiZulu): N=268; Passed Check=130 (48.5%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Africa (isiZulu) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=3, low_no=1, high_yes=38,
        high_no=19; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.223544630185352
      v: 0.429281857010957
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 4
      mean: 0.75
      sd: 0.5
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 57
      mean: 0.666666666666667
      sd: 0.475594865605671
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s13_e2
    site_id: 13
    site_label: South Africa (isiZulu)
    language: other
    language_other: isiZulu
    sample:
      n_final: 130
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 31.05 (sd 9.84, range 18–76); Gender % M/F/other: 27.9/69.9/2.2;
        Total N=268; Passed comprehension check N=130 (48.5%).'
      mean_age: 31.05
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (isiZulu): Age mean 31.05 (range 18–76; sd 9.84).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (isiZulu): N=268; Passed Check=130 (48.5%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Africa (isiZulu) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=2, low_no=2, high_yes=44,
        high_no=21; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.407799898257834
      v: 0.32534626825413
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 4
      mean: 0.5
      sd: 0.577350269189626
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 65
      mean: 0.676923076923077
      sd: 0.471291188773336
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s13_e3
    site_id: 13
    site_label: South Africa (isiZulu)
    language: other
    language_other: isiZulu
    sample:
      n_final: 130
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 31.05 (sd 9.84, range 18–76); Gender % M/F/other: 27.9/69.9/2.2;
        Total N=268; Passed comprehension check N=130 (48.5%).'
      mean_age: 31.05
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (isiZulu): Age mean 31.05 (range 18–76; sd 9.84).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (isiZulu): N=268; Passed Check=130 (48.5%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Africa (isiZulu) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=0, n_high=7, mean_low=None, mean_high=8.71428571428571,
        sd_low=None, sd_high=11.1162686442632.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: null
      v: null
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: true
      notes: Insufficient per-group data for esc_mean_sd (need n>=2 and finite SD in both stakes groups).
    quality_flags:
    - insufficient_data_for_split_effect
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 0
      mean: null
      sd: null
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 7
      mean: 8.71428571428571
      sd: 11.1162686442632
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s13_e4
    site_id: 13
    site_label: South Africa (isiZulu)
    language: other
    language_other: isiZulu
    sample:
      n_final: 130
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: non-students; Age mean 31.05 (sd 9.84, range 18–76); Gender % M/F/other: 27.9/69.9/2.2;
        Total N=268; Passed comprehension check N=130 (48.5%).'
      mean_age: 31.05
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (isiZulu): Age mean 31.05 (range 18–76; sd 9.84).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Africa (isiZulu): N=268; Passed Check=130 (48.5%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Africa (isiZulu) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=1, n_high=4, mean_low=5.0,
        mean_high=5.5, sd_low=None, sd_high=1.91485421551268.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: null
      v: null
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: true
      notes: Insufficient per-group data for esc_mean_sd (need n>=2 and finite SD in both stakes groups).
    quality_flags:
    - insufficient_data_for_split_effect
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 1
      mean: 5.0
      sd: null
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 4
      mean: 5.5
      sd: 1.91485421551268
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s14_e1
    site_id: 14
    site_label: South Korea (Korean)
    language: other
    language_other: Korean
    sample:
      n_final: 193
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 35.40 (sd 10.37, range 18–68); Gender % M/F/other: 41.5/58.5/0;
        Total N=256; Passed comprehension check N=193 (75.4%).'
      mean_age: 35.4
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Korea: Age mean 35.40 (range 18–68; sd 10.37).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Korea: N=256; Passed Check=193 (75.4%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Korea (Korean) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=7, low_no=25, high_yes=19,
        high_no=46; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.214336417883997
      v: 0.0781878913639849
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 32
      mean: 0.21875
      sd: 0.420013440645154
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 65
      mean: 0.292307692307692
      sd: 0.458362469936353
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s14_e2
    site_id: 14
    site_label: South Korea (Korean)
    language: other
    language_other: Korean
    sample:
      n_final: 193
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 35.40 (sd 10.37, range 18–68); Gender % M/F/other: 41.5/58.5/0;
        Total N=256; Passed comprehension check N=193 (75.4%).'
      mean_age: 35.4
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Korea: Age mean 35.40 (range 18–68; sd 10.37).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Korea: N=256; Passed Check=193 (75.4%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Korea (Korean) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=7, low_no=31,
        high_yes=19, high_no=39; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.423946773623045
      v: 0.0770206590854943
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 38
      mean: 0.184210526315789
      sd: 0.392859452063192
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 58
      mean: 0.327586206896552
      sd: 0.473432076473999
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s14_e3
    site_id: 14
    site_label: South Korea (Korean)
    language: other
    language_other: Korean
    sample:
      n_final: 193
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 35.40 (sd 10.37, range 18–68); Gender % M/F/other: 41.5/58.5/0;
        Total N=256; Passed comprehension check N=193 (75.4%).'
      mean_age: 35.4
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Korea: Age mean 35.40 (range 18–68; sd 10.37).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Korea: N=256; Passed Check=193 (75.4%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Korea (Korean) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=32, n_high=65, mean_low=7.21875,
        mean_high=12.9230769230769, sd_low=18.9630104711523, sd_high=25.8658242742159.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.239334748336968
      v: 0.04692987889885
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 32
      mean: 7.21875
      sd: 18.9630104711523
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 65
      mean: 12.9230769230769
      sd: 25.8658242742159
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s14_e4
    site_id: 14
    site_label: South Korea (Korean)
    language: other
    language_other: Korean
    sample:
      n_final: 193
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students and non-students; Age mean 35.40 (sd 10.37, range 18–68); Gender % M/F/other: 41.5/58.5/0;
        Total N=256; Passed comprehension check N=193 (75.4%).'
      mean_age: 35.4
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Korea: Age mean 35.40 (range 18–68; sd 10.37).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'South Korea: N=256; Passed Check=193 (75.4%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: South Korea (Korean) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=38, n_high=58, mean_low=6.89473684210526,
        mean_high=19.2241379310345, sd_low=9.95880562057196, sd_high=31.507750705294.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.486975335219731
      v: 0.044792298873156
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 38
      mean: 6.89473684210526
      sd: 9.95880562057196
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 58
      mean: 19.2241379310345
      sd: 31.507750705294
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s15_e1
    site_id: 15
    site_label: United States (English)
    language: English
    language_other: null
    sample:
      n_final: 348
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: students; Age mean 35.85 (sd 10.52, range 19–73); Gender % M/F/other: 55.5/44.5/0;
        Total N=396; Passed comprehension check N=348 (87.9%).'
      mean_age: 35.85
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'United States: Age mean 35.85 (range 19–73; sd 10.52).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'United States: N=396; Passed Check=348 (87.9%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: United States (English) — Evidence-fixed (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); low_yes=30, low_no=46, high_yes=27,
        high_no=70; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.289565853630032
      v: 0.0323402673806634
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 76
      mean: 0.394736842105263
      sd: 0.492041932316642
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 97
      mean: 0.278350515463918
      sd: 0.450515169029605
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s15_e2
    site_id: 15
    site_label: United States (English)
    language: English
    language_other: null
    sample:
      n_final: 348
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: students; Age mean 35.85 (sd 10.52, range 19–73); Gender % M/F/other: 55.5/44.5/0;
        Total N=396; Passed comprehension check N=348 (87.9%).'
      mean_age: 35.85
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'United States: Age mean 35.85 (range 19–73; sd 10.52).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'United States: N=396; Passed Check=348 (87.9%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: United States (English) — Evidence-fixed (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Binary choice: ''[name] knows'' vs ''only thinks he knows'' that the dam is secure.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2.
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    scale:
      label: binary
      points: 2
      anchors: knows / only thinks he knows
      direction: higher probability of selecting 'knows'
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data 2x2 stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); low_yes=33, low_no=48,
        high_yes=37, high_no=57; no continuity correction.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: 0.0316682797896812
      v: 0.0290915156544521
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_2x2 from exact 2x2 counts.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 81
      mean: 0.407407407407407
      sd: 0.494413232473044
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 94
      mean: 0.393617021276596
      sd: 0.491171194261993
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s15_e3
    site_id: 15
    site_label: United States (English)
    language: English
    language_other: null
    sample:
      n_final: 348
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: students; Age mean 35.85 (sd 10.52, range 19–73); Gender % M/F/other: 55.5/44.5/0;
        Total N=396; Passed comprehension check N=348 (87.9%).'
      mean_age: 35.85
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'United States: Age mean 35.85 (range 19–73; sd 10.52).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'United States: N=396; Passed Check=348 (87.9%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: United States (English) — Evidence-seeking (weak evidence (checked once))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to weak evidence (checked once); stakes
      contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: Medium
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked once
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within weak evidence (checked once) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within weak evidence (checked once); n_low=72, n_high=91, mean_low=2.65277777777778,
        mean_high=8.62637362637363, sd_low=3.97229745926099, sd_high=20.1993665201265.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.389640360498061
      v: 0.0253436042046761
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 72
      mean: 2.65277777777778
      sd: 3.97229745926099
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 91
      mean: 8.62637362637363
      sd: 20.1993665201265
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  - effect_id: s15_e4
    site_id: 15
    site_label: United States (English)
    language: English
    language_other: null
    sample:
      n_final: 348
      recruitment: other
      recruitment_other: Convenience sample (students/non-students; see Table 1).
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: 'Students: students; Age mean 35.85 (sd 10.52, range 19–73); Gender % M/F/other: 55.5/44.5/0;
        Total N=396; Passed comprehension check N=348 (87.9%).'
      mean_age: 35.85
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 4
        quote: 'United States: Age mean 35.85 (range 19–73; sd 10.52).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
      provenance:
        page: 4
        quote: 'United States: N=396; Passed Check=348 (87.9%).'
        table_ref: tabula_stream_p4_t1.csv
    subgroup: United States (English) — Evidence-seeking (strong evidence (checked several times))
    subgroup_desc: 'Free response (coded numeric): number of checks required before knowing.'
    design: Between-Subjects
    design_other: Computed from raw data after paper exclusions, stratified to strong evidence (checked several
      times); stakes contrast from group means/SDs via esc::esc_mean_sd.
    paradigm: Rating how much evidence is needed for knowledge
    scale:
      label: numeric/text input
      points: null
      anchors: How many times does the protagonist have to check before knowing?
      direction: higher numbers = more checks required
      provenance:
        page: 5
        quote: 'Evidence-seeking: How many times do you think [name] has to check the logs before he knows that the dam is secure?'
    moderators:
      scenario: other
      skeptical_pressure: 'No'
      awareness: 'Yes'
      evidence: First Person
      attribution_person: Other
      evidence_reliability: High
    moderators_coding:
      scenario:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The vignette concerns building/checking a dam (not a bank/peanuts/bridge/typos case).
      skeptical_pressure:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the dam is secure.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: No explicit doubt/counterconsideration is introduced; stakes are manipulated via consequences only.
      awareness:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: It is very important that the dam is secure. Due to the high water level, if it breaks, his kids
            will be swept away by the water.
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: The stakes are stated in the vignette presented to participants/protagonist.
      evidence:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Evidence is the agent’s own checking of the logs (first-person evidence).
      attribution_person:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Evidence-fixed: [name] ____________ that the dam is secure. ○ knows ○ only thinks he knows.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: Participants attribute knowledge to a third person ([name]).
      evidence_reliability:
        provenance:
          page: 5
          quote: 'Weak evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs once to make sure the
            dam is secure. Strong evidence: Once he has finished building the dam, he checks the logs several times
            to make sure the dam is secure.'
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
        reason: checked several times
    contrast:
      group_high: high_stakes
      group_low: low_stakes
      sign_convention: d = mean(low) - mean(high)
      other_notes: Within strong evidence (checked several times) stratum.
    reported_test:
      test: raw_data_stakes_contrast
      notes: Raw-data stakes contrast within strong evidence (checked several times); n_low=80, n_high=83, mean_low=4.775,
        mean_high=7.59036144578313, sd_low=3.0769662849936, sd_high=11.0266154113009.
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Computed from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) using paper filtering rules.
    effect_size:
      metric: SMD
      d: -0.345056147414946
      v: 0.0249134189823385
      computed_from: groups
      needs_review: false
      notes: Computed with esc::esc_mean_sd from raw group means/SDs.
    quality_flags: []
    notes: null
    groups:
    - group_id: low_stakes
      label: null
      n: 80
      mean: 4.775
      sd: 3.0769662849936
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    - group_id: high_stakes
      label: null
      n: 83
      mean: 7.59036144578313
      sd: 11.0266154113009
      se: null
      provenance:
        page: null
        quote: Derived from OSF raw dataset (GPP study 3 nlp.csv) after paper filtering logic.
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
  notes: 'Recoded on 2026-04-20: former site-level study entries were moved to effect-level site/sample fields so
    study_id matches the single cross-cultural study reported in the paper. Effect sizes and effect_id values were
    retained.'
