REPORT — pinillos2024bankcasesstakes

Summary

Extracted 1 study (between-subjects) comparing Modified Low Stakes vs Modified High Stakes bank cases.
Numeric results (cell counts and χ²) were recoverable from out/fulltext.md; out/tables/ was empty.

Primary sources used (pipeline outputs)

papers/pinillos2024bankcasesstakes/out/bundle.json
papers/pinillos2024bankcasesstakes/out/fulltext.md
papers/pinillos2024bankcasesstakes/out/tei.xml (for the binary response-option wording in a figure caption)

Computations

Computed SMD (d, v) from exact 2x2 counts via esc::esc_2x2 (OR -> d) in papers/pinillos2024bankcasesstakes/analysis/effect_sizes.qmd (rendered to effect_sizes.html).
Updated from prior χ²-based conversion (d=1.184643470864, v=0.053473566444) to count-based OR conversion (d=1.578014050158, v=0.099873738162).

Issues / uncertainties (needs human confirmation)

1) Bibliographic details (venue/DOI)

The pipeline outputs did not include full bibliographic venue information (book title/editors/publisher details) or a DOI.

Answer (fill in): - Full citation (APA): - DOI (if any):

2) Evidence reliability moderator

effect.moderators.evidence_reliability was left null because the vignette does not meaningfully specify/manipulate source reliability beyond a brief first-person memory report (“I was just there two weeks ago…”).

Answer (fill in): - Should evidence_reliability be coded as High / Medium / Low for this vignette? If yes, which and why?

3) PDF page numbers for provenance

GROBID/Markdown outputs did not provide stable PDF page mapping, so all provenance.page fields were set to null.

Answer (fill in): - If you want page numbers: provide the PDF page for (a) Methods sample description and (b) Results (counts + χ²).

4) Knowledge response options wording

The extraction used the TEI figure caption for the exact two response options. Please confirm these match the survey materials as presented in the PDF.

Answer (fill in): - Confirm options match PDF (Yes/No). If No, paste the exact option wording.