Extraction report: pinillos2012knowledgeexperimentspracitcal

What I used (pipeline outputs)

• papers/pinillos2012knowledgeexperimentspracitcal/out/bundle.json
• papers/pinillos2012knowledgeexperimentspracitcal/out/text.txt
• papers/pinillos2012knowledgeexperimentspracitcal/out/fulltext.md
• papers/pinillos2012knowledgeexperimentspracitcal/pdf/paper.pdf

Tables / figures

• out/tables/ is empty (Camelot/Tabula extractions were filtered out).
• Numeric evidence was taken from the text/footnotes and validated against PDF page images.

Computations (reproducible)

• Source: papers/pinillos2012knowledgeexperimentspracitcal/analysis/effect_sizes.qmd
• Rendered audit: papers/pinillos2012knowledgeexperimentspracitcal/analysis/effect_sizes.html

Methods used:

• Between-subject Mann-Whitney r -> d: esc::esc_rpb(..., es.type = "d")
• Within-subject paired contrast: metafor::escalc(measure = "SMCC", ti = t, ni = n_total)

Assumptions applied

• For contrasts where split group Ns were reported, those Ns were used directly in esc::esc_rpb.
• For contrasts where only total N was reported, equal split was assumed (n_low = n_high = totaln/2) and esc::esc_rpb(..., totaln = N) was used.
• For the Belief-fixed probe, reported r=.34 appears unsigned while Z=-2.98; sign was set by direction coding (d = mean(low) - mean(high)) using the reported medians.

Current status

All coded effects in YAML now have numeric d and v and are linked to the audit QMD.

Study 3 remains a special case for downstream synthesis:

• The within-subject juxtaposed effect is coded with SMCC because the paper reports a paired t on transformed differences, but not the condition-level SDs needed to recover an SMCRP effect.
• The YAML now flags this effect as a metric-mismatch sensitivity case for mixed-design meta-analysis.