pabich2018porownywaniestawki
Back to paper
Download · Edit · History · Raw
/data/papers/pabich2018porownywaniestawki/REPORT.md
Rendered Markdown.

Extraction Report: Pabich 2018

Source Crosswalk

  • Thesis PDF: pdf/paper.pdf
  • Text extraction: out/text.txt, out/fulltext.md
  • Raw scenario datasets: data/*.csv
  • Shared demographic/end files: data/demo/625672.csv, data/end/255249.csv
  • Manual numeric analysis: data/analiza_2025_bm.Rmd
  • Reproducible computation: analysis/effect_sizes.qmd

The thesis is treated as the source of truth for scenario wording, procedure, scale wording, sample description, and moderator coding. The 2025 reanalysis and raw CSV exports are treated as the source of truth for the extracted effect sizes.

Extraction Decisions

  • Included primary effects: three scenario-by-evidence-role high-vs-low contrasts where the subject of the target knowledge attribution is also the protagonist who has the evidence for the target proposition: Bank Swiadectwa = Tak, Biedronka Swiadectwa = Tak, and Orzeszki Swiadectwa = Tak.
  • Removed the three Swiadectwa = Nie effects because the target knowledge subject is not the protagonist whose evidence is described, making evidence and evidence reliability underdetermined under the target-subject coding rule.
  • Orzeszki skeptical pressure is coded to match the Sripada & Stanley pine-nuts cases: skeptical_pressure: No.
  • The extracted effects follow the retained rows from the final table in analiza_2025_bm.Rmd.
  • Effect computation: grouped low/high means, SDs, and Ns; SMD via esc::esc_mean_sd.
  • Effect design is coded as between-subjects because, within a fixed evidence/self-ascription role (Swiadectwa), high and low target ratings come from different scenario versions.

Issues For Review

HUMAN_CHECK_PABICH_SAMPLE_N

The thesis reports 771 participants and 18 exclusions. The 2025 analysis produces scenario-level cleaned counts of 263 Bank, 268 Biedronka, and 259 Orzeszki records after scenario-specific filters. The YAML uses the thesis-level n_final = 753 and the exact effect-level group Ns from the 2025 analysis.

Required human answer: confirm that thesis-level N = 753 should remain at study level.

Validation Notes

The YAML uses thesis pages for stimuli and question-wording provenance. Dataset-derived groups use table_ref values pointing to the 2025 Rmd and the reproducible QMD.