schema_version: "1.2"
extraction_run:
  created_at: "2026-05-06T00:00:00+02:00"
  created_by: "Codex"
  source_files:
    - "pdf/paper.pdf"
    - "data/analiza_2025_bm.Rmd"
    - "data/*.csv"
    - "data/demo/625672.csv"
    - "data/end/255249.csv"
  notes: "Thesis used for materials/procedure; 2025 manual analysis and raw survey exports used as numeric source of truth."
paper:
  paper_id: pabich2018porownywaniestawki
  citation: "Pabich, J. (2018). Wpływ porównywania stawki na przypisywanie wiedzy. Inwariantyzm praktyczny a intuicje potoczne. BA thesis, University of Warsaw."
  short_label: "Pabich 2018"
  doi: null
  published: "No"
  year: 2018
  language: other
  language_other: Polish
  research_objective: "Test whether comparing protagonists with different practical stakes affects ordinary knowledge attributions in Polish."
  data_availability:
    data_available_online: "No"
    url: null
    notes: "Unpublished local thesis dataset and 2025 reanalysis files are copied into this paper directory."
  notes: "The thesis reports 771 participants with 18 excluded. The 2025 analysis uses scenario-level cleaned files and attention-check filters; effect-level Ns in groups are the numeric source of truth."
studies:
  - study_id: 1
    label: "Comparing high- and low-stakes protagonists"
    language: other
    language_other: Polish
    objective: "Assess agreement with knowledge attributions for high- versus low-stakes protagonists across bank, pine-nut allergy, and Biedronka store-opening scenarios; meta-analytic effects retain only contrasts where the target protagonist has the self-ascription/evidence role."
    sample:
      n_final: 753
      recruitment: volunteers recruited via social media
      recruitment_other: null
      compensation: null
      compensation_other: null
      characteristics: "Online volunteer sample; thesis reports ages 18-75, mean age 25, after excluding failed control-question responses."
      provenance:
        page: 49
        quote: "W badaniu udział wzięło 771 osób, przy czym wyniki 18 z nich zostały odrzucone..."
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
      mean_age: 25
      mean_age_prov:
        page: 49
        quote: "Badani byli w przedziale wiekowym od 18 do 75 roku życia – średnia wieku wynosiła 25 lat."
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    design: null
    design_other: "Mixed presentation/order design. The extracted same-evidence-role high-vs-low contrasts are computed as between-subjects in the 2025 analysis."
    manipulated_factors:
      - "Target stakes: high versus low"
      - "Self-ascription/evidence holder: high-stakes protagonist versus low-stakes protagonist"
      - "Question order/presentation: high-first, low-first, or both"
      - "Scenario: bank, pine nuts, Biedronka"
    paradigm: Agreement with knowledge claim
    paradigm_other: null
    scale:
      label: Likert 7-point
      points: 7
      anchors: "1 = zupełnie się nie zgadzam; 7 = całkowicie się zgadzam"
      direction: "Higher values indicate stronger agreement with the knowledge attribution."
      provenance:
        page: 49
        quote: "Była to siedmiostopniowa skala Likerta... 1 – zupełnie się nie zgadzam, 7 – całkowicie się zgadzam."
        tei_id: null
        table_ref: null
    measures:
      knowledge_question_text: "Załóżmy, że [p] rzeczywiście. Na ile zgadzasz się ze stwierdzeniem [bohater] wie, że [p]?"
      knowledge_question_first: null
      additional_question_text: null
    scenarios:
      - scenario_code: bank
        scenario_type: "Bank-hours / bank open on Saturday"
        high_stakes_text: "Ala must pay a semester-repeatment installment or be removed from the student list."
        low_stakes_text: "Zosia has no urgent payments."
        provenance:
          page: 45
          quote: "Dla Ali to bardzo ważne... Zosia natomiast nie ma żadnych pilnych opłat."
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
      - scenario_code: peanuts
        scenario_type: "Pine-nut allergy in restaurant dish"
        high_stakes_text: "Marta has a severe allergic reaction to pine nuts."
        low_stakes_text: "Zuza only gets a dry mouth from pine nuts."
        provenance:
          page: 45
          quote: "u Marty powodują one silną reakcję alergiczną, a Zuza odczuwa tylko suchość w ustach."
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
      - scenario_code: other
        scenario_type: "Biedronka store open on Sunday"
        high_stakes_text: "Michał risks a serious conflict and breakup if he fails to buy groceries."
        low_stakes_text: "Piotrek simply wants chips."
        provenance:
          page: 46
          quote: "Dla Michała to bardzo ważne... Piotrek natomiast ma po prostu ochotę na chipsy."
          tei_id: null
          table_ref: null
    effects:
      - effect_id: s1_e2
        subgroup: "Bank: with self-ascription/evidence"
        subgroup_desc: "Bank scenario; target has the self-ascription/evidence role"
        design: Between-Subjects
        design_other: null
        moderators:
          scenario: bank
          skeptical_pressure: "Yes"
          awareness: "Yes"
          evidence: First Person
          attribution_person: Other
          evidence_reliability: Medium
        moderators_coding:
          scenario:
            provenance:
              page: 45
              quote: "czy bank będzie jutro otwarty"
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "The target proposition concerns bank opening hours."
          skeptical_pressure:
            provenance:
              page: 45
              quote: "banki nie w każdy weekend są otwarte"
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "The vignette explicitly raises the possibility that banks are not open every weekend."
          awareness:
            provenance:
              page: 45
              quote: "Dla Ali to bardzo ważne... Zosia natomiast nie ma żadnych pilnych opłat."
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "The scenario explicitly describes both protagonists' practical stakes."
          evidence:
            provenance:
              page: 45
              quote: "przypominając sobie, że dwa tygodnie temu była w banku w sobotę rano"
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "The central basis is the target protagonist's own memory of a prior Saturday visit."
          attribution_person:
            provenance:
              page: 48
              quote: "na ile zgadzasz się ze stwierdzeniem Ala wie..."
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "Participants judge a third-person attribution about a named protagonist."
          evidence_reliability:
            provenance:
              page: 45
              quote: "dwa tygodnie temu była w banku w sobotę rano"
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "Memory plus prediction from a prior visit is ordinary but fallible; coded Medium."
        contrast:
          group_high: bank_evidence_high
          group_low: bank_evidence_low
          sign_convention: "d = mean(low) - mean(high)"
          other_notes: "Swiadectwa = Tak in 2025 analysis."
        groups:
          - group_id: bank_evidence_low
            label: "Bank / Swiadectwa Tak / Niska"
            n: 108
            mean: 3.80555555556
            sd: 2.00214059901
            se: null
            provenance:
              page: null
              quote: "Computed from cleaned raw survey files in analiza_2025_bm.Rmd."
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: "analiza_2025_bm.Rmd; effect_sizes.qmd"
          - group_id: bank_evidence_high
            label: "Bank / Swiadectwa Tak / Wysoka"
            n: 155
            mean: 4.13548387097
            sd: 2.11696124827
            se: null
            provenance:
              page: null
              quote: "Computed from cleaned raw survey files in analiza_2025_bm.Rmd."
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: "analiza_2025_bm.Rmd; effect_sizes.qmd"
        effect_size:
          metric: SMD
          d: -0.159334904522
          v: 0.0157591375842
          computed_from: groups
          needs_review: false
          notes: "Computed in analysis/effect_sizes.qmd using esc::esc_mean_sd from the 2025 cleaned group summaries."
        quality_flags: []
        notes: null
      - effect_id: s1_e4
        subgroup: "Biedronka: with self-ascription/evidence"
        subgroup_desc: "Biedronka store-opening scenario; target has the self-ascription/evidence role"
        design: Between-Subjects
        design_other: null
        moderators:
          scenario: other
          skeptical_pressure: "Yes"
          awareness: "Yes"
          evidence: First Person
          attribution_person: Other
          evidence_reliability: Medium
        moderators_coding:
          scenario:
            provenance:
              page: 46
              quote: "czy Biedronka będzie otwarta"
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "The target proposition concerns whether a Biedronka store is open; this is outside the fixed scenario vocabulary."
          skeptical_pressure:
            provenance:
              page: 46
              quote: "Sklepy są przecież teraz zamknięte w niedziele"
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "A character explicitly raises a counterconsideration about Sunday store closures."
          awareness:
            provenance:
              page: 46
              quote: "Dla Michała to bardzo ważne... Piotrek natomiast ma po prostu ochotę na chipsy."
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "The scenario explicitly describes both protagonists' stakes."
          evidence:
            provenance:
              page: 46
              quote: "przypominając sobie, że w poprzednią niedzielę sklep był otwarty"
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "The basis is the target protagonist's own memory of the store being open the previous Sunday."
          attribution_person:
            provenance:
              page: 48
              quote: "na ile zgadzasz się ze stwierdzeniem Michał wie..."
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "Participants judge a third-person attribution about a named protagonist."
          evidence_reliability:
            provenance:
              page: 46
              quote: "w poprzednią niedzielę sklep był otwarty"
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "Memory plus projection from a prior opening day is ordinary but fallible; coded Medium."
        contrast:
          group_high: biedronka_evidence_high
          group_low: biedronka_evidence_low
          sign_convention: "d = mean(low) - mean(high)"
          other_notes: "Swiadectwa = Tak in 2025 analysis."
        groups:
          - group_id: biedronka_evidence_low
            label: "Biedronka / Swiadectwa Tak / Niska"
            n: 105
            mean: 4.39047619048
            sd: 1.98792140233
            se: null
            provenance:
              page: null
              quote: "Computed from cleaned raw survey files in analiza_2025_bm.Rmd."
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: "analiza_2025_bm.Rmd; effect_sizes.qmd"
          - group_id: biedronka_evidence_high
            label: "Biedronka / Swiadectwa Tak / Wysoka"
            n: 163
            mean: 4.05521472393
            sd: 2.1059924312
            se: null
            provenance:
              page: null
              quote: "Computed from cleaned raw survey files in analiza_2025_bm.Rmd."
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: "analiza_2025_bm.Rmd; effect_sizes.qmd"
        effect_size:
          metric: SMD
          d: 0.162698137881
          v: 0.0157081644536
          computed_from: groups
          needs_review: false
          notes: "Computed in analysis/effect_sizes.qmd using esc::esc_mean_sd from the 2025 cleaned group summaries."
        quality_flags: []
        notes: null
      - effect_id: s1_e6
        subgroup: "Orzeszki: with self-ascription/evidence"
        subgroup_desc: "Pine-nut allergy scenario; target has the self-ascription/evidence role"
        design: Between-Subjects
        design_other: null
        moderators:
          scenario: peanuts
          skeptical_pressure: "No"
          awareness: "Yes"
          evidence: External
          attribution_person: Other
          evidence_reliability: High
        moderators_coding:
          scenario:
            provenance:
              page: 45
              quote: "orzeszkami pinii"
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "The vignette concerns whether food contains pine nuts."
          skeptical_pressure:
            provenance:
              page: 45
              quote: "sprawdza w karcie, że ich dania nie zawierają orzeszków pinii"
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "Matched to the Sripada & Stanley pine-nuts coding: no explicit doubt/counterconsideration cue, such as a prompt that the menu might be wrong."
          awareness:
            provenance:
              page: 45
              quote: "u Marty powodują one silną reakcję alergiczną, a Zuza odczuwa tylko suchość w ustach"
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "The stakes are explicitly described in the scenario."
          evidence:
            provenance:
              page: 45
              quote: "sprawdza w karcie, że ich dania nie zawierają orzeszków pinii"
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "The central evidence is a restaurant menu, an external written source."
          attribution_person:
            provenance:
              page: 48
              quote: "na ile zgadzasz się ze stwierdzeniem Zuza wie..."
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "Participants judge a third-person attribution about a named protagonist."
          evidence_reliability:
            provenance:
              page: 45
              quote: "sprawdza w karcie, że ich dania nie zawierają orzeszków pinii"
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: null
            reason: "A restaurant menu is an institutional written source; coded High."
        contrast:
          group_high: orzeszki_evidence_high
          group_low: orzeszki_evidence_low
          sign_convention: "d = mean(low) - mean(high)"
          other_notes: "Swiadectwa = Tak in 2025 analysis."
        groups:
          - group_id: orzeszki_evidence_low
            label: "Orzeszki / Swiadectwa Tak / Niska"
            n: 156
            mean: 3.03846153846
            sd: 2.03480875026
            se: null
            provenance:
              page: null
              quote: "Computed from cleaned raw survey files in analiza_2025_bm.Rmd."
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: "analiza_2025_bm.Rmd; effect_sizes.qmd"
          - group_id: orzeszki_evidence_high
            label: "Orzeszki / Swiadectwa Tak / Wysoka"
            n: 103
            mean: 3.69902912621
            sd: 2.08088853315
            se: null
            provenance:
              page: null
              quote: "Computed from cleaned raw survey files in analiza_2025_bm.Rmd."
              tei_id: null
              table_ref: "analiza_2025_bm.Rmd; effect_sizes.qmd"
        effect_size:
          metric: SMD
          d: -0.321722594819
          v: 0.0163188117029
          computed_from: groups
          needs_review: false
          notes: "Computed in analysis/effect_sizes.qmd using esc::esc_mean_sd from the 2025 cleaned group summaries."
        quality_flags: []
        notes: null
    notes: "Effects with Swiadectwa = Nie were removed because the subject of the target knowledge attribution is not the protagonist who has the evidence for the target proposition. The remaining effects follow the 2025 reanalysis for Swiadectwa = Tak, with SMD computed from grouped low/high ratings."
