Extraction report: dinges2021knowledgeasymmetricloss

Pipeline outputs used (preferred order)

• papers/dinges2021knowledgeasymmetricloss/out/bundle.json confirmed the extraction run completed but produced no usable table CSVs (all Camelot/Tabula candidates were filtered out).
• papers/dinges2021knowledgeasymmetricloss/out/fulltext.md used for vignette/prompt wording and context.
• papers/dinges2021knowledgeasymmetricloss/out/tei.xml used for DOI and publication date metadata.

Manual interventions (documented)

1) Table extraction produced no outputs

• papers/dinges2021knowledgeasymmetricloss/out/tables/ is empty (tables were filtered out by the pipeline).
• To verify the reported cell means/SDs, I rendered the PDF pages containing Table 1 / figures:
• papers/dinges2021knowledgeasymmetricloss/out/images/pages/p018.png (Table 1 + ANOVA summary)
• papers/dinges2021knowledgeasymmetricloss/out/images/pages/p017.png (Fig. 3)
• papers/dinges2021knowledgeasymmetricloss/out/images/pages/p019.png (Fig. 4)

2) Used OSF data to recover per-cell Ns (and recompute summaries)

• The paper provides an OSF view-only link (footnote) to a complete dataset.
• I downloaded the Qualtrics XML export:
• papers/dinges2021knowledgeasymmetricloss/data/data_study_1.xml
• This was necessary because Table 1 reports means and SDs but not per-cell Ns, and group Ns are required to compute d and v without guessing.

Computations (reproducible)

• Effect sizes were computed in Quarto (no ad-hoc scripts):
• papers/dinges2021knowledgeasymmetricloss/analysis/effect_sizes.qmd
• Rendered audit output:
  • papers/dinges2021knowledgeasymmetricloss/analysis/effect_sizes.html
• Exclusions implemented per paper:
• 8 attention-check failures (check != 1 in the OSF data)
• outliers: one low-stakes 90% response = 65; two high-stakes 70% responses = 50 and 70
• Note on OSF variable naming:
• In the Qualtrics export, the condition variables are suffix-swapped relative to the paper’s “70% vs 90%” labels (handled explicitly in analysis/effect_sizes.qmd).

Notes / potential issues

• Ingestion produced the directory key dinges2021knowledgeasymmetricloss (based on GROBID’s header date); the PDF issue header is (2023). The extraction YAML uses paper.year: 2023 with the DOI unchanged.
• The DV is a certainty/evidence-threshold measure (not a direct knowledge attribution), so moderators.attribution_person is coded null and justified in moderators_coding.

Open questions (for human review)

None.