paper_key <- "buckwalter2014themysterofstakes"
sign_convention <- "d = mean(low) - mean(high)"
effects <- list(
list(
study_id = 1,
effect_id = "s1_e1",
method_used = "between_groups",
n_low = 185 / 8,
n_high = 185 / 8,
mean_low = 3.48,
sd_low = 1.62,
mean_high = 4.15,
sd_high = 1.05,
notes_on_assumptions = "Bank denial, low error. Equal-cell approximation in 2x2x2 design: analyzed N=185 implies 23.125 per cell."
),
list(
study_id = 1,
effect_id = "s1_e2",
method_used = "between_groups",
n_low = 185 / 8,
n_high = 185 / 8,
mean_low = 4.27,
sd_low = 1.08,
mean_high = 3.92,
sd_high = 1.12,
notes_on_assumptions = "Bank denial, high error. Equal-cell approximation in 2x2x2 design: analyzed N=185 implies 23.125 per cell."
),
list(
study_id = 1,
effect_id = "s1_e3",
method_used = "between_groups",
n_low = 185 / 8,
n_high = 185 / 8,
mean_low = 4.70,
sd_low = 0.56,
mean_high = 4.48,
sd_high = 0.59,
notes_on_assumptions = "Bank assertion, low error. Equal-cell approximation in 2x2x2 design: analyzed N=185 implies 23.125 per cell."
),
list(
study_id = 1,
effect_id = "s1_e4",
method_used = "between_groups",
n_low = 185 / 8,
n_high = 185 / 8,
mean_low = 4.05,
sd_low = 1.30,
mean_high = 4.33,
sd_high = 0.73,
notes_on_assumptions = "Bank assertion, high error. Equal-cell approximation in 2x2x2 design: analyzed N=185 implies 23.125 per cell."
),
list(
study_id = 2,
effect_id = "s2_e1",
method_used = "between_groups",
n_low = 90 / 4,
n_high = 90 / 4,
mean_low = 2.61,
sd_low = 0.89,
mean_high = 5.12,
sd_high = 3.42,
notes_on_assumptions = "Typo knowledge probe. Equal-cell approximation in 2x2 design: analyzed N=90 implies 22.5 per cell."
)
)Effect size computations: buckwalter2014themysterofstakes
Computes standardized mean differences (d) and sampling variances (v) for papers/buckwalter2014themysterofstakes/buckwalter2014themysterofstakes.yaml.
All effects below use the analyst-authorized equal-cell assumption.
- Study 1 is a
2 x 2 x 2between-subjects design. The paper reportsN = 215before exclusions, states that30participants were removed for failed comprehension checks, and reports omnibus tests with denominatordf = 177. These are consistent with an analyzedN = 185, so equal allocation across the 8 cells implies23.125participants per cell. - Study 2 is a
2 x 2between-subjects design. The paper reports100participants and10removals, and the omnibus ANOVA denominatordf = 86implies an analyzedN = 90. Equal allocation across the 4 cells implies22.5participants per cell.
Inputs and methods
Computation
if (!requireNamespace("esc", quietly = TRUE)) {
stop("Package 'esc' is required for this template. Install with install.packages('esc').", call. = FALSE)
}
suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(esc))
stop_if_missing <- function(x, name) {
if (is.na(x)) stop(sprintf("Missing required input: %s", name), call. = FALSE)
}
extract_esc <- function(x) {
list(
d = as.numeric(x$es),
v = as.numeric(x$var)
)
}
compute_with_esc <- function(fun, ...) {
d_obj <- fun(..., es.type = "d")
g_obj <- fun(..., es.type = "g")
d_out <- extract_esc(d_obj)
g_out <- extract_esc(g_obj)
list(d = d_out$d, v = d_out$v, g = g_out$d, v_g = g_out$v)
}
compute_effect <- function(effect_inputs) {
study_id <- effect_inputs$study_id
effect_id <- effect_inputs$effect_id
method_used <- effect_inputs$method_used
n_high <- effect_inputs$n_high
n_low <- effect_inputs$n_low
mean_high <- effect_inputs$mean_high
mean_low <- effect_inputs$mean_low
sd_high <- effect_inputs$sd_high
sd_low <- effect_inputs$sd_low
notes_on_assumptions <- effect_inputs$notes_on_assumptions
if (method_used != "between_groups") {
stop(sprintf("This paper uses between_groups only; got method_used=%s", method_used), call. = FALSE)
}
stop_if_missing(n_high, "n_high")
stop_if_missing(n_low, "n_low")
stop_if_missing(mean_high, "mean_high")
stop_if_missing(mean_low, "mean_low")
stop_if_missing(sd_high, "sd_high")
stop_if_missing(sd_low, "sd_low")
res <- compute_with_esc(
esc::esc_mean_sd,
grp1m = mean_low,
grp1sd = sd_low,
grp1n = n_low,
grp2m = mean_high,
grp2sd = sd_high,
grp2n = n_high
)
inputs_used <- paste(
c(
sprintf("method=%s", method_used),
sprintf("sign_convention=%s", sign_convention),
sprintf("n_low=%s", n_low),
sprintf("n_high=%s", n_high),
sprintf("mean_low=%s", mean_low),
sprintf("sd_low=%s", sd_low),
sprintf("mean_high=%s", mean_high),
sprintf("sd_high=%s", sd_high)
),
collapse = ", "
)
data.frame(
paper_key = paper_key,
study_id = study_id,
effect_id = effect_id,
design = "Between-Subjects",
method_used = method_used,
computed_from_suggested = "groups",
inputs_used = inputs_used,
d = res$d,
v = res$v,
g = res$g,
v_g = res$v_g,
notes_on_assumptions = notes_on_assumptions,
stringsAsFactors = FALSE
)
}
audit <- do.call(rbind, lapply(effects, compute_effect))
audit paper_key study_id effect_id design
1 buckwalter2014themysterofstakes 1 s1_e1 Between-Subjects
2 buckwalter2014themysterofstakes 1 s1_e2 Between-Subjects
3 buckwalter2014themysterofstakes 1 s1_e3 Between-Subjects
4 buckwalter2014themysterofstakes 1 s1_e4 Between-Subjects
5 buckwalter2014themysterofstakes 2 s2_e1 Between-Subjects
method_used computed_from_suggested
1 between_groups groups
2 between_groups groups
3 between_groups groups
4 between_groups groups
5 between_groups groups
inputs_used
1 method=between_groups, sign_convention=d = mean(low) - mean(high), n_low=23.125, n_high=23.125, mean_low=3.48, sd_low=1.62, mean_high=4.15, sd_high=1.05
2 method=between_groups, sign_convention=d = mean(low) - mean(high), n_low=23.125, n_high=23.125, mean_low=4.27, sd_low=1.08, mean_high=3.92, sd_high=1.12
3 method=between_groups, sign_convention=d = mean(low) - mean(high), n_low=23.125, n_high=23.125, mean_low=4.7, sd_low=0.56, mean_high=4.48, sd_high=0.59
4 method=between_groups, sign_convention=d = mean(low) - mean(high), n_low=23.125, n_high=23.125, mean_low=4.05, sd_low=1.3, mean_high=4.33, sd_high=0.73
5 method=between_groups, sign_convention=d = mean(low) - mean(high), n_low=22.5, n_high=22.5, mean_low=2.61, sd_low=0.89, mean_high=5.12, sd_high=3.42
d v g v_g
1 -0.4908129 0.08909078 -0.4824467 0.08909078
2 0.3181292 0.08758061 0.3127066 0.08758061
3 0.3824786 0.08806800 0.3759591 0.08806800
4 -0.2655908 0.08724906 -0.2610637 0.08724906
5 -1.0044622 0.10009938 -0.9868400 0.10009938
notes_on_assumptions
1 Bank denial, low error. Equal-cell approximation in 2x2x2 design: analyzed N=185 implies 23.125 per cell.
2 Bank denial, high error. Equal-cell approximation in 2x2x2 design: analyzed N=185 implies 23.125 per cell.
3 Bank assertion, low error. Equal-cell approximation in 2x2x2 design: analyzed N=185 implies 23.125 per cell.
4 Bank assertion, high error. Equal-cell approximation in 2x2x2 design: analyzed N=185 implies 23.125 per cell.
5 Typo knowledge probe. Equal-cell approximation in 2x2 design: analyzed N=90 implies 22.5 per cell.
Paste-ready YAML snippets
for (i in seq_len(nrow(audit))) {
row <- audit[i, ]
cat(sprintf("\n# %s (study_id=%s)\n", row$effect_id, row$study_id))
cat(sprintf(
"effect_size:\n metric: SMD\n d: %.12f\n v: %.12f\n computed_from: %s\n needs_review: false\n notes: \"%s\"\n",
row$d,
row$v,
row$computed_from_suggested,
gsub("\"", "'", row$inputs_used)
))
}
# s1_e1 (study_id=1)
effect_size:
metric: SMD
d: -0.490812856859
v: 0.089090781194
computed_from: groups
needs_review: false
notes: "method=between_groups, sign_convention=d = mean(low) - mean(high), n_low=23.125, n_high=23.125, mean_low=3.48, sd_low=1.62, mean_high=4.15, sd_high=1.05"
# s1_e2 (study_id=1)
effect_size:
metric: SMD
d: 0.318129239182
v: 0.087580607706
computed_from: groups
needs_review: false
notes: "method=between_groups, sign_convention=d = mean(low) - mean(high), n_low=23.125, n_high=23.125, mean_low=4.27, sd_low=1.08, mean_high=3.92, sd_high=1.12"
# s1_e3 (study_id=1)
effect_size:
metric: SMD
d: 0.382478573848
v: 0.088067998481
computed_from: groups
needs_review: false
notes: "method=between_groups, sign_convention=d = mean(low) - mean(high), n_low=23.125, n_high=23.125, mean_low=4.7, sd_low=0.56, mean_high=4.48, sd_high=0.59"
# s1_e4 (study_id=1)
effect_size:
metric: SMD
d: -0.265590823941
v: 0.087249064711
computed_from: groups
needs_review: false
notes: "method=between_groups, sign_convention=d = mean(low) - mean(high), n_low=23.125, n_high=23.125, mean_low=4.05, sd_low=1.3, mean_high=4.33, sd_high=0.73"
# s2_e1 (study_id=2)
effect_size:
metric: SMD
d: -1.004462158914
v: 0.100099380319
computed_from: groups
needs_review: false
notes: "method=between_groups, sign_convention=d = mean(low) - mean(high), n_low=22.5, n_high=22.5, mean_low=2.61, sd_low=0.89, mean_high=5.12, sd_high=3.42"